From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: jianqiang wang <wjq.sec@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Heap overflow vulnerabilities in network implementation of barebox
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 09:41:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlQ5Ge4r9nP4CCBn@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMn3X6NejkLSeyFvJ7Z-0APaUHK8eTWRgFKvbft3SLJp4nO1YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:51:01PM +0200, jianqiang wang wrote:
> Dear Barebox devlopers,
>
> I found several heap overflow vulnerabilities in Barebox.
>
> The Barebox implementation assumes that the network packet received is
> less than PKTSIZE, that is 1536 bytes. For example, the /net/net.c
> file ping_reply function assumes that the packet received is 1536
> bytes and allocates a 1536 bytes buffer then copies the packet data
> into the buffer.
>
> However, in the driver layer, it lacks a proper check of the packet length.
> For example, in drivers/net/cs8900.c cs8900_probe function, it
> allocates a PKTSIZE buffer and assigns it to rx_buf. In cs8900_recv
> function, the length is read from the device register:
>
> len = readw(priv->regs + CS8900_RTDATA0);
>
> After that, the data is read from the register in a loop without a
> boundary check.
> The same vulnerability happens to the following drivers:
>
> drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c function ks8851_rx_frame, it only and the
> packet length with RXFHBCR_CNT_MASK (4095 bytes,) which is not
> consistent with the upper layer length check.
>
> drivers/net/liteeth.c function liteeth_eth_rx, It checks if the length
> is larger than 2048 which is inconsistent with the upper layer.
>
> drivers/net/smc911x.c function smc911x_eth_rx. The packet length is
> read from the register without checking.
>
> It would be good to add a proper and consistent boundary check for
> these drivers otherwise it will lead to potential heap overflow
> vulnerability.
Thanks for noting this. I've just sent a series fixing the drivers you
explicitly mentioned. Additionally I have checked a few other drivers
and it seems at least the smc91111 driver has this issue as well. Are
you aware of other drivers?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-27 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 16:51 jianqiang wang
2024-05-27 7:41 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2024-05-27 9:45 ` jianqiang wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlQ5Ge4r9nP4CCBn@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=wjq.sec@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox