From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>
Cc: BAREBOX <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PBL: fdt: add fdt_fixup_mem to fixup memory nodes
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 08:22:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDVaFl2OFfqev_Fv@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250526-rk3588-optee-v1-6-5004995cbd03@pengutronix.de>
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 04:38:12PM +0200, Michael Tretter wrote:
> Board code in the PBL may use fdt_fixup_mem() to write the base
> addresses and sizes of detected SDRAM to the fdt before passing the fdt
> to other software like the TF-A and OP-TEE.
>
> This is implemented on the fdt to avoid that the PBL needs to unpack the
> device tree, use the of function for manipulation and repack the device
> tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> include/pbl.h | 1 +
> pbl/fdt.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/pbl.h b/include/pbl.h
> index abac3458593af2cec972a54ce9fb69e344179670..b330010562c4aba5fccbb4c421bb95291fa0bea1 100644
> --- a/include/pbl.h
> +++ b/include/pbl.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ extern unsigned long free_mem_end_ptr;
> void pbl_barebox_uncompress(void *dest, void *compressed_start, unsigned int len);
>
> void fdt_find_mem(const void *fdt, unsigned long *membase, unsigned long *memsize);
> +int fdt_fixup_mem(void *fdt, unsigned long membase[], unsigned long memsize[], size_t num);
>
> struct fdt_device_id {
> const char *compatible;
> diff --git a/pbl/fdt.c b/pbl/fdt.c
> index 3b1783152a8cb81f3eda1187b2f7bf998c4addf4..40564952acfcd88bef050966720e76b7378bc720 100644
> --- a/pbl/fdt.c
> +++ b/pbl/fdt.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #include <linux/libfdt.h>
> #include <pbl.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
>
> static const __be32 *fdt_parse_reg(const __be32 *reg, uint32_t n,
> uint64_t *val)
> @@ -73,6 +74,76 @@ void fdt_find_mem(const void *fdt, unsigned long *membase, unsigned long *memsiz
> while (1);
> }
>
> +int fdt_fixup_mem(void *fdt, unsigned long membase[], unsigned long memsize[], size_t num)
> +{
> + int na, ns;
> + int node, root;
> + int err;
> + int i;
> +
> + err = fdt_check_header(fdt);
> + if (err != 0) {
> + pr_err("Invalid device tree blob\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + root = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/");
> + if (root < 0) {
> + pr_err("Cannot find root node: %s\n", fdt_strerror(root));
> + return root;
> + }
> +
> + na = fdt_address_cells(fdt, root);
> + if (na < 0) {
> + pr_err("Cannot find #address-cells property: %s\n",
> + fdt_strerror(na));
> + return na;
> + }
> +
> + ns = fdt_size_cells(fdt, root);
> + if (ns < 0) {
> + pr_err("Cannot find #size-cells property: %s\n",
> + fdt_strerror(ns));
> + return ns;
> + }
fdt_appendprop_addrrange() handles #address-cells and #size-cells
internally, consequently na and ns are not used in this function.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + char name[32];
> +
> + if (membase[i] == 0 || memsize[i] == 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "memory@%lx", membase[i]);
> + node = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, root, name);
There are some pitfalls in this function when the device tree already
has memory nodes. It seems fdt_add_subnode() returns -FDT_ERR_EXISTS
in case the node already exists. You should likely check that.
Some device trees have a plain "memory" node without the @address
postfix. These should be deleted before adding other memory nodes.
> + if (node < 0) {
> + pr_err("Cannot to add node %s: %s\n",
> + name, fdt_strerror(node));
> + err = node;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("Add memory node %s (0x%lx, size 0x%lx)\n",
> + name, membase[i], memsize[i]);
> +
> + err = fdt_setprop(fdt, node,
> + "device_type", "memory", sizeof("memory"));
> + if (err < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: Cannot set device_type: %s\n",
> + name, fdt_strerror(err));
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = fdt_appendprop_addrrange(fdt, root, node, "reg", membase[i], memsize[i]);
This sounds like it appends the range to ranges already existing in the
node. Do you have to call fdt_delprop(..., "reg") beforehand?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-27 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-26 14:38 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: rockchip: fix dynamic shared memory in OP-TEE Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: rockchip: fix formatting Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 17:30 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: rockchip: dmc: use RK3588_INT_REG_START for rk3588 Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 17:29 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] lib: fdt: add fdt_addresses Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 17:29 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] PBL: fdt: refactor helper for reading nr of cells Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 17:30 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] PBL: fdt: make minimum fdt size configurable Michael Tretter
2025-05-27 6:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-05-27 8:48 ` Michael Tretter
2025-05-27 18:45 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-05-28 8:24 ` Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] PBL: fdt: add fdt_fixup_mem to fixup memory nodes Michael Tretter
2025-05-27 6:22 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2025-05-27 8:34 ` Michael Tretter
2025-05-27 18:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: rockchip: dmc: add rk3588_ram_sizes to get full ram size Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 16:33 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-27 6:25 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-05-27 8:39 ` Michael Tretter
2025-05-27 9:06 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: rockchip: pass device tree to TF-A Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 16:37 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-27 8:03 ` Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: rockchip: fixup memory in device tree for TF-A Michael Tretter
2025-05-26 17:25 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-27 8:16 ` Michael Tretter
2025-05-27 9:40 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-27 10:19 ` Michael Tretter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDVaFl2OFfqev_Fv@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.tretter@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox