From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] test: Add pytest suite for NVMEM framework
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:17:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFEklASqd3f7AUT5@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFEhPCJWVpRUVbqk@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:03:08AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:58:12AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Introduce test_nvmem.py, a pytest-based suite for
> > validating Barebox's NVMEM framework and shell commands.
> > It uses pytest-labgrid for target interaction.
> >
> > Tests cover:
> >
> > - nvmem command: Listing, dynamic rmem creation (-c, -v), parameter
> > validation, help.
> >
> > - CDEV operations (/dev/rmemX): md/mw for read/write with various access
> > sizes (byte, word, long), byte swapping (-x), string/numerical data,
> > and wrapped md output.
> >
> > - Protection: protect/unprotect commands, including writes to
> > protected/unprotected areas, out-of-bounds protection attempts, and
> > merging of overlapping protected ranges.
> >
> > Includes helpers for parsing md output and checks command return
> > codes and data integrity. A session-wide fixture skips tests if
> > essential related CONFIGs are disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > test/py/test_nvmem.py | 1012 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 1012 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 test/py/test_nvmem.py
> >
> > diff --git a/test/py/test_nvmem.py b/test/py/test_nvmem.py
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..fdb3c8eb6022
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/py/test_nvmem.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1012 @@
> > +import pytest
> > +import re
> > +
> > +# --- Essential Configuration Check ---
> > +
> > +# This list should contain the CONFIG strings for all commands and features
> > +# that are absolutely essential for the NVMEM test suite to run.
> > +ESSENTIAL_CONFIGS = [
> > + "CONFIG_CMD_NVMEM", # For the 'nvmem' command itself
> > + "CONFIG_CMD_MD", # For the 'md' (memory display) command
> > + "CONFIG_CMD_MW", # For the 'mw' (memory write) command
> > + "CONFIG_CMD_FLASH", # For 'protect' and 'unprotect' commands
> > + "CONFIG_NVMEM_RMEM", # For creating dynamic rmem NVMEM devices
> > + "CONFIG_FS_DEVFS" # For /dev/ device character file paths
> > +]
>
> There doesn't seem to be any config with this combination of options, so
> I assume this test will never be executed.
>
> Specifically CONFIG_CMD_NVMEM is disabled in all defconfigs. It's a good
> thing for coverage to have at least one config with this option enabled,
> could you add it to multi_v8_defconfig?
Ack, and for sandbox. I was testing it on sandbox.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 6:58 [PATCH v3 0/9] NVMEM: Introduce write protection support Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] nvmem: Add 'protect' operation to core framework Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] nvmem: rmem: add write and protect support Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] commands: nvmem: Add support for creating dynamic rmem devices Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] regmap: Add reg_seal operation for hardware protection Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] nvmem: regmap: Implement protect operation using regmap_seal Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] nvmem: bsec: Implement NVMEM protect via regmap_seal for OTP locking Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] nvmem: rmem: ensure unique device name per instance Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] fs: Report errors for out-of-bounds protect operations Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-17 7:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-06-12 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] test: Add pytest suite for NVMEM framework Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-17 8:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-06-17 8:17 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2025-06-17 8:04 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] NVMEM: Introduce write protection support Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFEklASqd3f7AUT5@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox