From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@barebox.org>, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] lib: add talloc for overlaying a tree onto allocations
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:55:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ36OuSKNw7m45LD@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94867b83-cde8-449f-8ed4-d97855831d09@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:26:02AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/28/25 10:42 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 08:54:32AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> +#ifndef __TALLOC_H__
> >> +#define __TALLOC_H__
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >> +
> >> +struct talloc {
> >> + struct talloc *child;
> >> + struct talloc *next;
> >> + union {
> >> + struct talloc *prev;
> >> + struct talloc *parent; /* Valid only when is_first(mem) */
> >> + };
> >> +};
> >
> > Currently tlsf allocations are 8 byte aligned. On 32bit architectures
> > struct talloc will be 12 bytes, so talloc allocations will only have 4
> > byte alignment.
>
> Good catch. On 32-bit, there is 4 bytes of unused padding inside TLSF
> and feels bad sacrificing 4 more bytes here. :/
I find the memory leak checker extremly useful and it becomes even more
useful with the memory leaks in hush fixed.
I suggest we add an __aligned(8) here and be done with it for now.
We can still think about it when widening the talloc use for
dev_kmalloc(), but as long as it's only used by hush we shouldn't hold
this series up.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 7:54 Ahmad Fatoum
2025-10-27 7:54 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] test: self: add talloc selftest Ahmad Fatoum
2025-10-27 7:54 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] hush: fix memory leaks Ahmad Fatoum
2025-10-28 9:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] lib: add talloc for overlaying a tree onto allocations Sascha Hauer
2025-10-28 10:26 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2025-11-07 13:55 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2025-11-07 13:56 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2025-11-10 8:12 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQ36OuSKNw7m45LD@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@barebox.org \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox