From: Alexander Kurz <akurz@blala.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: i.MX7: add AIPS base address defines
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:32:45 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1701271227450.25349@blala.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170126071640.owiwqt5eyr3wtzr7@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:31:55PM +0100, Alexander Kurz wrote:
> > Import the ARM IP bus base addresses from IMX7DRM 05/2016 AIPS Memory Map
>
> In my reference manual the addresses are given directly as numbers. I
> often wondered for the other i.MX SoCs what the advantage of such such
> multi-stage defines is:
>
> #define MX7_AIPS1_ARB_BASE_ADDR 0x30000000
> #define MX7_ATZ1_BASE_ADDR MX7_AIPS1_ARB_BASE_ADDR
> #define MX7_AIPS1_OFF_BASE_ADDR (MX7_ATZ1_BASE_ADDR + 0x200000)
> #define MX7_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR (MX7_AIPS1_OFF_BASE_ADDR)
>
> I often enough ended up calculating the values by hand to get the
> address to type into barebox md/mw commands or to see which address
> is meant to look it up in the reference manual (for some defines which
> do not have a clear name)
>
> Are there any real advantages of these multi stage defines? Otherwise
> I would suggest to use the absolute addresses directly.
Yes indeed, the lookup of cascaded defines is quite annoying and I am not
aware of any benefit.
I'll post an updated version of this patch.
Cheers, Alexander
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-25 11:31 Alexander Kurz
2017-01-26 7:16 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-01-27 11:32 ` Alexander Kurz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1701271227450.25349@blala.de \
--to=akurz@blala.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox