From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: how easy to add extra config for NAND-less beagle?
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:39:58 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1211151128470.5359@oneiric> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121115161615.GI10369@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:36:37AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > returning to playing with barebox after lengthy hiatus and i asked
> > an equivalent question on the u-boot list, let's see if it's relevant
> > here.
> >
> > i did a regular configure and build for my beagle xM (rev C) which,
> > unlike the beagle classic, has no NAND flash:
> >
> > $ make omap3530_beagle_xload_defconfig ; make
> > $ make omap3530_beagle_defconfig ; make
> >
> > then copied MLO and barebox.bin to an appropriate card and, lo, it
> > booted nicely and i'm currently sitting in barebox:
> >
> > barebox@Texas Instrument's Beagle:/ version
> >
> > barebox 2012.10.0-00283-gd65d9df #2 Thu Nov 15 06:45:21 EST 2012
> >
> > thing is, this build has a good deal of NAND-related functionality
> > that is of no use whatsoever on the current beagle xMs, so i'm
> > interested in how little work it would take to add an extra config
> > that would deselect everything related to NAND. (obviously, having
> > that functionality there doesn't *hurt*, but i'm planning to use
> > barebox in my new embedded linux courses and it would be nice to be
> > able to build for an xM and have it *totally* correspond to the actual
> > hardware.) it shouldn't be hard -- simply deselecting anything
> > related to NAND, MTD or JFFS2 should do the trick.
>
> Disable MTD support and if you want also the protect/erase commands:
>
> make menuconfig
>
> Drivers --->
> [ ] Memory Technology Device (MTD) support --->
>
> commands --->
> flash --->
> [ ] protect/erase
>
> Saves you around 35Kb of binary space
yup, i'm testing that shortly, but my question was more along the
lines of, rather than having to disable all NAND-related
functionality *manually*, how easy/worthwhile would it be to create an
additional make target that reflects a beagle *without* NAND flash?
one significant difference between a classic beagle and a current xM
is the total lack of NAND flash, and that's not a minor difference.
it means you can remove all barebox functionality related to that --
NAND routines and support, MTD stuff, JFFS2(?) support, and so on.
this could be automated by creating a couple new configs, say:
make dm3730_beaglexm_xload_defconfig
make dm3730_beaglexm_defconfig
so that the result really matches the underlying board.
is this worth doing? it would seem to be fairly easy, i can whip
something up and test it.
rday
p.s. there are other significant differences as well -- onboard
ethernet, 4-port USB hub. it seems to me that there is enough of a
difference to warrant a separate configuration. thoughts?
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 14:36 Robert P. J. Day
2012-11-15 16:16 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-15 16:39 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2012-11-15 19:22 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-15 19:26 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-16 11:16 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1211151128470.5359@oneiric \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox