From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TaNPc-0005ai-1G for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:13:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" In-Reply-To: <20121119082015.GZ10369@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: References: <20121119082015.GZ10369@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: are there still issues with building sandbox on x86_64? To: Sascha Hauer Cc: "U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)" On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:27:55PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > perusing the page in the wiki discussing sandbox: > > > > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=user:building > > > > which mentions problems with sandbox on x86_64. i've had no trouble > > building and running sandbox under ubuntu on my 64-bit asus laptop. > > are there specific known issues? thanks. > > Not that I know of. It should be fine now. ok, i'll remove the warning about x86_64 from that page. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox