mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Baeuerle, Florian" <Florian.Baeuerle@allegion.com>
To: "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] commands/of_property: add option to apply changes as fixup
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 08:23:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd4f70ba1cfd3b817494cc4629bed17a5015a714.camel@allegion.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180525071156.txqmmif6qbqn4hnm@pengutronix.de>

Hi Sascha,

Thanks for the review!

I've got one more question (below).

Am Freitag, den 25.05.2018, 09:11 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> HI Florian,
> 
> looks good generally. Some small comments below.
> 
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:48:47PM +0000, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > +static int of_fixup_property_set(struct device_node *root, void *context)
> > +{
> > +	const struct of_fixup_property_data *fixup = context;
> > +	int ret = do_of_property_set_now(root, fixup->path, fixup->propname,
> > +			fixup->data, fixup->len);
> > +
> > +	free(fixup->path);
> > +	free(fixup->propname);
> > +	free(fixup->data);
> 
> Don't free here. A fixup can be called multiple times.

It looks like I should not free at all (of_fixup_status neither does).
Can you confirm that?

> 
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int of_fixup_property_delete(struct device_node *root, void *context)
> > +{
> > +	const struct of_fixup_property_data *fixup = context;
> > +	int ret = do_of_property_delete_now(root, fixup->path, fixup->propname);
> > +
> > +	free(fixup->path);
> > +	free(fixup->propname);
> 
> ditto.
> 
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_of_property_set_fixup(const char *path, const char *propname,
> > +		void *data, int len)
> > +{
> > +	struct of_fixup_property_data *fixup;
> > +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	fixup = xzalloc(sizeof(*fixup));
> > +	if (!fixup)
> > +		goto out_fixup;
> 
> The 'x' versions of the alloc functions always return successfully, no
> need to check.
> 
> > +static int do_of_property_set_now(struct device_node *root, const char *path,
> > +		const char *propname, void *data, int len)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_node *node = of_find_node_by_path_or_alias(root, path);
> > +	struct property *pp = NULL;
> 
> No need to initialize.
> 
> > +
> > +	if (!node) {
> > +		printf("Cannot find nodepath %s\n", path);
> > +		return -ENOENT;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pp = of_find_property(node, propname, NULL);
> > +
> > +	if (pp) {
> > +		free(pp->value);
> > +		pp->value_const = NULL;
> > +
> > +		/* limit property data to the actual size */
> > +		if (len)
> > +			pp->value = xrealloc(data, len);
> > +		else
> > +			pp->value = NULL;
> > +
> > +		pp->length = len;
> > +	} else {
> > +		pp = of_new_property(node, propname, data, len);
> > +		if (!pp) {
> > +			printf("Cannot create property %s\n", propname);
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_of_property_delete_now(struct device_node *root, const char *path,
> > +		const char *propname)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_node *node = of_find_node_by_path_or_alias(root, path);
> > +	struct property *pp = NULL;
> 
> ditto.
> 
> Sascha
> 

-- Florian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-25  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-24 14:48 Baeuerle, Florian
2018-05-25  7:11 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-05-25  8:23   ` Baeuerle, Florian [this message]
2018-05-25  8:39     ` s.hauer
2018-05-25  8:06 ` Baeuerle, Florian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd4f70ba1cfd3b817494cc4629bed17a5015a714.camel@allegion.com \
    --to=florian.baeuerle@allegion.com \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox