* imx8: 'struct dram_timing_info' incompatibilities
@ 2024-04-29 16:32 Enrico Scholz
2024-04-29 17:41 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Scholz @ 2024-04-29 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Hi,
commit e6234f90 ("ddr: Initial i.MX9 support") adds unconditionally
fields to the dram timing info object (include/soc/imx/ddr.h):
| struct dram_timing_info {
| ...
| + /* fsp config */
| + struct dram_fsp_cfg *fsp_cfg;
| + unsigned int fsp_cfg_num;
However, the iMX8 ATF ([1]) does not have this field and DRAM related
SMC calls like
| arm_smccc_smc(FSL_SIP_DDR_DVFS, 0x11, i, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
in the NXP busfreq-imx8mq.c driver will fail [2].
Am I missing something here or should the dram_timing_info table somehow
translated between these architectures (e.g. in dram_config_save())?
Enrico
Footnotes:
[1] https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-atf/blob/lf_v2.8/plat/imx/imx8m/include/dram.h
[2] typical message: "imx_busfreq: probe of busfreq failed with error -22"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: imx8: 'struct dram_timing_info' incompatibilities
2024-04-29 16:32 imx8: 'struct dram_timing_info' incompatibilities Enrico Scholz
@ 2024-04-29 17:41 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2024-04-29 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Enrico Scholz, barebox
Hello Enrico,
On 29.04.24 18:32, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> commit e6234f90 ("ddr: Initial i.MX9 support") adds unconditionally
> fields to the dram timing info object (include/soc/imx/ddr.h):
>
> | struct dram_timing_info {
> | ...
> | + /* fsp config */
> | + struct dram_fsp_cfg *fsp_cfg;
> | + unsigned int fsp_cfg_num;
>
>
> However, the iMX8 ATF ([1]) does not have this field and DRAM related
> SMC calls like
>
> | arm_smccc_smc(FSL_SIP_DDR_DVFS, 0x11, i, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
>
> in the NXP busfreq-imx8mq.c driver will fail [2].
>
>
> Am I missing something here or should the dram_timing_info table somehow
> translated between these architectures (e.g. in dram_config_save())?
No, you are right. See the patch I shortly before:
https://lore.barebox.org/barebox/20240429141610.3556452-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/T/#u
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
>
>
> Enrico
>
> Footnotes:
> [1] https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-atf/blob/lf_v2.8/plat/imx/imx8m/include/dram.h
>
> [2] typical message: "imx_busfreq: probe of busfreq failed with error -22"
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-29 17:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-29 16:32 imx8: 'struct dram_timing_info' incompatibilities Enrico Scholz
2024-04-29 17:41 ` Ahmad Fatoum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox