From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Gilles DOFFE <gilles.doffe@savoirfairelinux.com>,
barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: rennes-dev@savoirfairelinux.com, jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common: avoid bootchooser double watchdog configuration
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:25:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d526d7ce-39bf-94e3-a61b-22b9f3043bf3@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617224851.1163860-1-gilles.doffe@savoirfairelinux.com>
Hello Gilles,
On 6/18/20 12:48 AM, Gilles DOFFE wrote:
> In case bootchooser is used, boot_entry() will be called twice:
> 1) boot bootchooser
> 2) boot <chosen_entry>
> Thus it will lead to twice watchdog configuration if watchdog_timeout
> is set.
> Except that it should be activated only once in any way, it leads
> to unwanted reset when issuing too much "near" calls of the watchdog
> configuration for da9062.
Imagine I have boot.default="bootchooser recovery". Both bootchooser
slots fail, so I boot the recovery slot, but with your patch
applied, the watchdog wouldn't be enabled, no?
The da9063 suffers from the same problem and this was instead addressed
by dropping requests that come in too fast. See
cbfdbf38c190 ("mfd: da9063: fix watchdog ping execution")
Cheers
Ahmad
> Can be reproduced with this command:
> barebox/ wd 30;wd 30
> Even if this commands are intentional, 'boot bootchooser' is not.
> Resetting watchdog_timeout to 0 after first watchdog
> configuration solves this problem ensuring watchdog will not be
> configured a second time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilles DOFFE <gilles.doffe@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> common/boot.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/boot.c b/common/boot.c
> index f546fce62..8d09f96b6 100644
> --- a/common/boot.c
> +++ b/common/boot.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ int boot_entry(struct bootentry *be, int verbose, int dryrun)
> boot_watchdog_timeout);
> if (ret)
> pr_warn("Failed to enable watchdog: %s\n", strerror(-ret));
> +
> + boot_watchdog_timeout = 0;
> }
>
> ret = be->boot(be, verbose, dryrun);
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 22:48 Gilles DOFFE
2020-06-18 10:25 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2020-06-18 10:35 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d526d7ce-39bf-94e3-a61b-22b9f3043bf3@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=gilles.doffe@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=rennes-dev@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox