From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Rashidwi <rashidwinter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uimage: fix CRC32 verification on NFS
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:00:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df25b302-805f-48df-8a9a-eb601e127e18@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zw0wHH440fOO9BLm@pengutronix.de>
On 14.10.24 16:52, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:18:18PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 14.10.24 15:10, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 06:07:15PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/common/uimage.c b/common/uimage.c
>>>> index 140a08c1e426..c578edae2606 100644
>>>> --- a/common/uimage.c
>>>> +++ b/common/uimage.c
>>>> @@ -272,7 +272,9 @@ int uimage_verify(struct uimage_handle *handle)
>>>> ret = read(handle->fd, buf, now);
>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>> goto err;
>>>> - crc = crc32(crc, buf, now);
>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>> + break;
>>>
>>> Should we have an extra error message in this case? The information that
>>> a uImage is shorter than expected might be valuable for the user.
>>
>> I don't see the need to differentiate between premature end and corrupted
>> bytes. Both are problems in another layer anyway and people still stuck
>> using uImage may not like losing extra bytes for an error message anyway.
>
> I could imagine that knowing that the image is too short would put me on
> another path when searching for the issue.
>
> Anyway, debugging this shouldn't be too hard, even without this
> information.
Agreed.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Sascha
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 16:07 Ahmad Fatoum
2024-10-14 13:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-10-14 13:18 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-10-14 14:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-10-14 15:00 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2024-10-15 8:17 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df25b302-805f-48df-8a9a-eb601e127e18@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rashidwinter@gmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox