From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] mci: Add sdhci helper
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e407553f-18d5-4fb3-e630-de620b6b501e@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119105036.12300-2-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On 11/19/19 11:50 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> We have several SDHCI compatible drivers in the tree. This starts
> with a set of generic helper functions for these drivers to share
> some common functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/mci/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/mci/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/mci/sdhci.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mci/sdhci.h | 45 +++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 176 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mci/sdhci.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/Kconfig b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> index 4a71a46097..c37d40195a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ config MCI_MMC_BOOT_PARTITIONS
>
> comment "--- MCI host drivers ---"
>
> +config MCI_SDHCI
> + bool
> +
> config MCI_DW
> bool "Synopsys DesignWare Memory Card Interface"
> depends on HAS_DMA
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/Makefile b/drivers/mci/Makefile
> index 04c1287fee..9efdbd651e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mci/Makefile
> @@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_SPI) += mci_spi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_DW) += dw_mmc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_MMCI) += mmci.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_STM32_SDMMC2) += stm32_sdmmc2.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_SDHCI) += sdhci.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/sdhci.c b/drivers/mci/sdhci.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..1ab1c0f236
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mci/sdhci.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <driver.h>
> +#include <mci.h>
> +#include <io.h>
> +
> +#include "sdhci.h"
> +
> +void sdhci_read_response(struct sdhci *sdhci, struct mci_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + if (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_136) {
> + u32 cmdrsp3, cmdrsp2, cmdrsp1, cmdrsp0;
> +
> + cmdrsp3 = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_RESPONSE_3);
> + cmdrsp2 = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_RESPONSE_2);
> + cmdrsp1 = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_RESPONSE_1);
> + cmdrsp0 = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_RESPONSE_0);
> + cmd->response[0] = (cmdrsp3 << 8) | (cmdrsp2 >> 24);
> + cmd->response[1] = (cmdrsp2 << 8) | (cmdrsp1 >> 24);
> + cmd->response[2] = (cmdrsp1 << 8) | (cmdrsp0 >> 24);
> + cmd->response[3] = (cmdrsp0 << 8);
> + } else {
> + cmd->response[0] = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_RESPONSE_0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void sdhci_set_cmd_xfer_mode(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd,
> + struct mci_data *data, bool dma, u32 *command,
> + u32 *xfer)
> +{
> + *command = 0;
> + *xfer = 0;
> +
> + if (!(cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_PRESENT))
> + *command |= SDHCI_RESP_NONE;
> + else if (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_136)
> + *command |= SDHCI_RESP_TYPE_136;
> + else if (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_BUSY)
> + *command |= SDHCI_RESP_TYPE_48_BUSY;
> + else
> + *command |= SDHCI_RESP_TYPE_48;
> +
> + if (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_CRC)
> + *command |= SDHCI_CMD_CRC_CHECK_EN;
> + if (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_OPCODE)
> + *command |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX_CHECK_EN;
> +
> + *command |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX(cmd->cmdidx);
> +
> + if (data) {
> + *command |= SDHCI_DATA_PRESENT;
> +
> + *xfer |= SDHCI_BLOCK_COUNT_EN;
> +
> + if (data->blocks > 1)
> + *xfer |= SDHCI_MULTIPLE_BLOCKS;
> +
> + if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ)
> + *xfer |= SDHCI_DATA_TO_HOST;
> +
> + if (dma)
> + *xfer |= SDHCI_DMA_EN;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_rx_pio(struct sdhci *sdhci, struct mci_data *data,
> + unsigned int block)
> +{
> + u32 *buf = (u32 *)data->dest;
> + int i;
> +
> + buf += block * data->blocksize / sizeof(u32);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < data->blocksize / sizeof(u32); i++)
> + buf[i] = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_BUFFER);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_tx_pio(struct sdhci *sdhci, struct mci_data *data,
> + unsigned int block)
> +{
> + const u32 *buf = (const u32 *)data->src;
> + int i;
> +
> + buf += block * data->blocksize / sizeof(u32);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < data->blocksize / sizeof(u32); i++)
> + sdhci_write32(sdhci, SDHCI_BUFFER, buf[i]);
> +}
> +
> +int sdhci_transfer_data(struct sdhci *sdhci, struct mci_data *data)
> +{
> + unsigned int block = 0;
> + u32 stat, prs;
> + uint64_t start = get_time_ns();
> +
> + do {
> + stat = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> + if (stat & SDHCI_INT_ERROR)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + if (block >= data->blocks)
> + continue;
> +
> + prs = sdhci_read32(sdhci, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE);
> +
> + if (prs & SDHCI_BUFFER_READ_ENABLE &&
> + data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ) {
> + sdhci_rx_pio(sdhci, data, block);
> + block++;
> + start = get_time_ns();
> + }
> +
> + if (prs & SDHCI_BUFFER_WRITE_ENABLE &&
> + !(data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ)) {
> + sdhci_tx_pio(sdhci, data, block);
> + block++;
> + start = get_time_ns();
> + }
> +
> + if (is_timeout(start, 10 * SECOND))
10 seconds are a lot, should we call into barebox poller meanwhile?
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + } while (!(stat & SDHCI_INT_XFER_COMPLETE));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/sdhci.h b/drivers/mci/sdhci.h
> index 90595e6433..640398d9d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mci/sdhci.h
> @@ -149,4 +149,49 @@
> #define PRSSTAT_CIDHB 0x00000002
> #define PRSSTAT_CICHB 0x00000001
>
> +struct sdhci {
> + u32 (*read32)(struct sdhci *host, int reg);
> + u16 (*read16)(struct sdhci *host, int reg);
> + u8 (*read8)(struct sdhci *host, int reg);
> + void (*write32)(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u32 val);
> + void (*write16)(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u16 val);
> + void (*write8)(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u8 val);
> +};
> +
> +static inline u32 sdhci_read32(struct sdhci *host, int reg)
> +{
> + return host->read32(host, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 sdhci_read16(struct sdhci *host, int reg)
> +{
> + return host->read16(host, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 sdhci_read8(struct sdhci *host, int reg)
> +{
> + return host->read8(host, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sdhci_write32(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + host->write32(host, reg, val);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sdhci_write16(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + host->write16(host, reg, val);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sdhci_write8(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + host->write8(host, reg, val);
> +}
> +
> +void sdhci_read_response(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd);
> +void sdhci_set_cmd_xfer_mode(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd,
> + struct mci_data *data, bool dma, u32 *command,
> + u32 *xfer);
> +int sdhci_transfer_data(struct sdhci *sdhci, struct mci_data *data);
> +
> #endif /* __MCI_SDHCI_H */
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 10:50 [PATCH 00/21] mci: SDHCI helper functions and arasan driver Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 01/21] mci: Add sdhci helper Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 11:10 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2019-11-19 13:09 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 02/21] mci: sdhci: Add missing command type defines Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 03/21] mci: imx-esdhc: use sdhci helpers Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 04/21] mci: bcm2835: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 05/21] mci: tegra: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 06/21] mci: dove: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 07/21] mci: imx-esdhc: Use 16bit register definitions Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 08/21] mci: mci-bcm2835: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 09/21] mci: tegra: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 10/21] mci: imx-esdhc-pbl: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 11/21] mci: sdhci: remove 32bit register defines Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 12/21] mci: sdhci: remove duplicate transfer mode " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 13/21] mci: sdhci: remove duplicate register defines for interrupt bits Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 14/21] mci: sdhci: remove duplicate register defines for prsstat bits Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 15/21] mci: dove: Use sdhci_set_cmd_xfer_mode() Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 16/21] mci: imx-esdhc: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 17/21] mci: bcm2835: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 18/21] mci: tegra: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 19/21] mci: imx-esdhci: Use generic PIO transfer function Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 20/21] mci: mci-bcm2835: " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-19 10:50 ` [PATCH 21/21] mci: add Arasan SDHCI controller driver Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e407553f-18d5-4fb3-e630-de620b6b501e@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox