From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
BAREBOX <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: fdt: fix oob writes with large ftd properties
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:21:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec788b5c-dab3-4018-ad94-26bd0a71b108@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131-fix-fdt-memory-safety-v1-2-3d3a2c797eec@pengutronix.de>
On 31.01.24 17:57, Stefan Kerkmann wrote:
> OOB writes can be triggered when fdt->dt_size * 2 is still smaller than
> the property for which memory should be allocated. This can happen under
> rare circumstances when editing a fdt with the of_property command and a
> property is larger than 128k in size.
>
> This happend when editing a FIT image (which is a ftd) with the
> of_property command and the Kernel image was around 8M in size.
>
> The simplified call chain is the following:
>
> of_property -> of_flatten_dtb -> create new fdt with 64k in size (this is
> fixed) -> __of_flatten_dtb -> attempt to copy kernel image (8M) ->
> fdt_ensure_space -> allocate only 128k for fdt->dt -> memcopy 8M into fdt->dt
> buffer -> crash
>
> The fix is to grow fdt->dt to hold at least the new property. The power
> of 2 increment is untouched to keep the same behaviour otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index 4f79a6120f..1f24ed0bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -399,6 +399,10 @@ static int fdt_ensure_space(struct fdt *fdt, int dtsize)
> previous = fdt->dt;
> new_size = fdt->dt_size * 2;
>
> + while (new_size <= dtsize) {
> + new_size *= 2;
> + }
A nitpick that I solely note because I already had feedback on the first patch:
Kernel coding style is to omit { braces } for single statement blocks.
In your case you could just do:
if (new_size <= dtsize)
new_size = roundup_pow_of_two(new_size + dtsize);
I think to skip the loop.
Cheers,
Ahmad
> +
> if ((fdt->dt = memalign_realloc(previous, fdt->dt_size,
> new_size)) == NULL) {
> free(previous);
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 16:56 [PATCH 0/2] of: fdt: fix memory leak and oob writes in fdt_ensure_space Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-31 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: fdt: fix memory leak " Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-31 17:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-02-01 8:34 ` Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-31 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: fdt: fix oob writes with large ftd properties Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-31 17:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2024-02-01 10:24 ` Stefan Kerkmann
2024-02-01 10:42 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-02-01 7:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-02-01 8:49 ` Stefan Kerkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec788b5c-dab3-4018-ad94-26bd0a71b108@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox