From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:18:42 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wwx2v-0059Hj-15 for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:18:42 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BBE201B9A for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=jegMhl8W; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From :Message-ID:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=qgVnfin0nESPbmjCYaeId3nukTLy85lcy/F8CXsND+Q=; b=jegMhl8WbCM7GNKEddXdmz3lmb gbXNHtHSBNK7be3XVXVOQKi+ZspEpDNf2fh98SXpMqDNKBPGWdip3HaT9gqyhLTsPDIjrs1RZIHY/ riZPnhu6PjGk32VYSjoylGfwG1U8Pe7RS8ImuAle0KxgXMHoE+D8xOKzO9oyu15n53e2DuW1aXp68 k+vXV2VuQ2Rct1+uf0BqrRN3LsU6DT0oXN6fWa2LXyfcrwNiBXaoJudaF/Iz4cNUKB4uQ9QPkdJnz Rcy0c8nK5iM5F9CyKZjBmrKt05cw1VMDaDHcS7F+smGSEmXRemhn5JHfHHcAMwp1OwE5+19MM8fTn PqScHxJQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wwx2c-0000000B1lK-2qMU; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:18:22 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wwx2Z-0000000B1ku-2OnU for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:18:21 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:560:5dd5:4b00:9ebf:dff:fe00:fdb5]) (Authenticated sender: sha@pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BF8920190E; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:18:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: "Sascha Hauer" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PBL: constructor fixes To: "Stefan Kerkmann" In-Reply-To: References: <20260819-next-v1-0-c1a1a8b44d02@pengutronix.de> <0c26bfcc-deb4-400c-aa46-e20f839d4194@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:18:17 +0000 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260820_001819_767151_7E295AD8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.43 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 2026-08-20 09:14, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 8/19/26 17:01, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 8/19/26 4:12 PM, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: > [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?b?b3BlbiBsaXN0OkJBUkVCT1g=?= , Ahmad Fatoum Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: ghp4rwatrkj5pzsj4tkacyt68iwymbif X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.91 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; CC_EXCESS_BASE64(1.50)[]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2607:7c80:54:3::133:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORWARDED(0.00)[barebox@lists.infradead.org]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E3BBE201B9A On 2026-08-20 09:14, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 8/19/26 17:01, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 8/19/26 4:12 PM, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Kerkmann > >>> --- > >>> Stefan Kerkmann (2): > >>> ARM/ARM64/RISC-V: pbl: guard constructor support > >>> ARM64: setup_c: abi safe link register storage > >> > >> if these are applied after what's in next, we would have intermittent > >> breakage when doing a bisect right? > >> > >> I would suggest either turning these into fixups or just resend the > >> whole series. > >=20 > > I just squashed them into the original commit. But next time, yes, you > > can send --fixup patches for patches in next. > >=20 >=20 > Thanks, I missed the bisectability requirement for this series. For the s= etup_c > patch I actually send an amend patch to include it in the original series= with: >=20 > git send-email HEAD^ --to=3D"Sascha Hauer " --to= =3D"\"open > list:BAREBOX\" " --cc=3D"Stefan Kerkmann > " > --in-reply-to=3D"<20260817-feature-pbl-get-time-ns-v3-2-9874c1438855@peng= utronix.de>" >=20 > But it maybe wasn't picked up by b4 at the time the original merge happen= ed? It picked it up. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |