From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <oss-tools-bounces@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:00:39 +0200
From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20210330140039.t37z4tya6o2pw2ar@pengutronix.de>
References: <20210326210647.8648-1-rhi@pengutronix.de>
 <20210330110855.efi4twmm5ybbub2u@pengutronix.de>
 <2fee9810-d20a-dea2-9eb8-9fd5c2ef07f0@pengutronix.de>
 <20210330133040.srgjieqjojrgkaio@pengutronix.de>
 <0254ee44-047f-abe9-af4a-43cdfde0dccd@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0254ee44-047f-abe9-af4a-43cdfde0dccd@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [OSS-Tools] [PATCH dt-utils 1/4] treewide: add SPDX identifiers
 to files with GPL-2.0-or-later license
List-Id: Pengutronix Public Open-Source-Development <oss-tools.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/oss-tools>, 
 <mailto:oss-tools-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oss-tools/>
List-Post: <mailto:oss-tools@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:oss-tools-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oss-tools>, 
 <mailto:oss-tools-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1098548653=="
Errors-To: oss-tools-bounces@pengutronix.de
Sender: "OSS-Tools" <oss-tools-bounces@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: oss-tools@pengutronix.de, Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>


--===============1098548653==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="am2zqxoj4jzjtioz"
Content-Disposition: inline


--am2zqxoj4jzjtioz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ahmad,

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:50:19PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 30.03.21 15:30, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:22:26PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> On 30.03.21 13:08, Roland Hieber wrote:
> >>> Uwe, could I get a Reviewed-by from you for these four patches? :-)
> >>
> >> We must still carry the full license texts in the project (cf. Linux
> >> LICENSES/). This is missing here, no?
> >=20
> > well, it depends on what you want to achieve. If you want to become SPDX
> > conformant this is indeed necessary. IMHO the conversion from several
> > different boilerplate license specifications to a single line is
> > beneficial even if the full licenses are not (yet) in the project.
>=20
> If the code says that the license terms need to be distributed along
> with the software, you are violating the license terms, if you don't
> abide by this. This is unrelated to SPDX-Conformance.

If distributing the full license text is required, this was a problem
already before, wasn't it?

Best regards
Uwe

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

--am2zqxoj4jzjtioz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEfnIqFpAYrP8+dKQLwfwUeK3K7AkFAmBjLwQACgkQwfwUeK3K
7AlEYggAlrnJVIQvB2l9Ufq08TOKSdfFFECJ1coIN7HlNLOrl1Ad73EVpXfba9+2
chBD2TOp6DOiLgBVDjTGfmNqErAP19r/2qsCoU7+VS2kX/NjkyE3p34dSBQMU0a0
T1mUNMbs9HlKaJNSUjC1mvEpWrUvvG1XH929P2WIgQ+GCLwBPBot9fZDcNFQNBC8
6wS23jcpYdRIXo8KqUePZdNsm/cBmLbK1lEqbe0/yerhiNtZ1X9j5XA5BDOC8BXo
xnASNlXamCBltwW2QQhHDk68BvlgUb3IbIDkpHjgfSbKG0dCwMNHxv2ljr5Kwik4
bfViTNy26LJQpIqhREgwr2Fif5MQ0A==
=FlwG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--am2zqxoj4jzjtioz--


--===============1098548653==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
OSS-Tools mailing list
OSS-Tools@pengutronix.de

--===============1098548653==--