From: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: oss-tools@pengutronix.de,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [OSS-Tools] [PATCH dt-utils 1/4] treewide: add SPDX identifiers to files with GPL-2.0-or-later license
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:10:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331101028.p2xtnyzgbwa4yabe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210331100305.e4klllzxx4p7yhxo@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:03:05PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:31:24PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > If Zlib says "This notice may not be removed or altered from any
> > source distribution.", I interpret this as meaning that we need to ship
> > the full text as part of the source distribution and only a
> > SPDX-License-Identifier that can be looked up on a website somewhere doesn't
> > suffice.
>
> Yes. Hmm. GPL says a similar thing in Clause 1 ("keep intact all the
> notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty").
> When thinking about it, I'd rather keep the original comment headers
> intact and only add an SPDX license tag, and I don't understand why
> these notices were removed in Linux when Linux moved to SPDX
> identifiers. I also didn't find any reasoning on this.
Only this entry in the REUSE FAQ, which recommends to leave the
copyright notices intact.
https://reuse.software/faq/#edit-copyright-and-licensing
- Roland
--
Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K. | r.hieber@pengutronix.de |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
OSS-Tools mailing list
OSS-Tools@pengutronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-31 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 21:06 Roland Hieber
2021-03-26 21:06 ` [OSS-Tools] [PATCH dt-utils 2/4] treewide: add SPDX identifiers to files with GPL-2.0-only license Roland Hieber
2021-03-30 12:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-03-26 21:06 ` [OSS-Tools] [PATCH dt-utils 3/4] treewide: add SPDX identifier to files with Zlib license Roland Hieber
2021-03-30 12:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-03-26 21:06 ` [OSS-Tools] [PATCH dt-utils 4/4] treewide: add SPDX identifiers to files without license Roland Hieber
2021-03-30 11:08 ` [OSS-Tools] [PATCH dt-utils 1/4] treewide: add SPDX identifiers to files with GPL-2.0-or-later license Roland Hieber
2021-03-30 11:22 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-30 13:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-03-30 13:50 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-30 14:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-03-30 14:04 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-30 15:53 ` Roland Hieber
2021-03-30 17:31 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-31 10:03 ` Roland Hieber
2021-03-31 10:10 ` Roland Hieber [this message]
2021-03-30 12:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-08-01 10:10 ` Roland Hieber
2023-08-01 10:12 ` Roland Hieber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210331101028.p2xtnyzgbwa4yabe@pengutronix.de \
--to=rhi@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=oss-tools@pengutronix.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox