mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] of: partition: support of_partition_ensure_probed on parent device
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 06:48:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0166cc41-dd9b-728c-a478-85bb8ec5b196@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531163056.tcjwizntvsrbekm6@pengutronix.de>

Hello Marco,

On 31.05.23 18:30, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
> 
> On 23-05-31, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> barebox-state code uses of_partition_ensure_probed to resolve the
>> backend property. We want to allow backend to point directly at a
>> storage device instead of a partition. We can't determine whether a DT
>> device is a storage device though before it's probed, so let's have
>> of_partition_ensure_probed support either case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/partition.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  drivers/of/platform.c  |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/partition.c b/drivers/of/partition.c
>> index 40c47f554ad2..a70e503cec9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/partition.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/partition.c
>> @@ -110,14 +110,32 @@ int of_parse_partitions(struct cdev *cdev, struct device_node *node)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * of_partition_ensure_probed - ensure a parition is probed
>> + * @np: pointer to a partition or to a partitionable device
>> + *      Unfortunately, there is no completely reliable way
>> + *      to differentiate partitions from devices prior to
>> + *      probing, because partitions may also have compatibles.
>> + *      We only handle nvmem-cells, so anything besides that
>> + *      is assumed to be a device that should be probed directly.
>> + *
>> + * Returns zero on success or a negative error code otherwise
>> + */
>>  int of_partition_ensure_probed(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>> -	np = of_get_parent(np);
>> +	struct device_node *parent = of_get_parent(np);
>>  
>> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fixed-partitions"))
>> -		np = of_get_parent(np);
>> +	if (parent && of_device_is_compatible(parent, "fixed-partitions"))
> 
> When is the parent not present? This should only be the case when 'np'
> points to the root_node. So in case of !parent I would return -EINVAL
> early.

will do.

> 
>> +		return of_device_ensure_probed(of_get_parent(np));
> 							     ^
> 							   parent?

Yes, You're right.

> Not related to this patch but the logic would become easier if would
> have devices for each mtd-part, like the kernel does. In such case we
> could avoid these special handlings and just use
> of_device_ensure_probed() at least for the mtd-parts, nvmem-cells still
> need a special handling.

How you mean? of_partition_ensure_probed can be called before there can
be any devices at all.

> 
> Regards,
>   Marco
> 
>> -	return np ? of_device_ensure_probed(np) : -EINVAL;
>> +	if (of_get_compatible_child(np, "fixed-partitions"))
>> +		return of_device_ensure_probed(np);

I think this can be dropped, so the case falls through to the final
of_device_ensure_probed.

>> +
>> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "compatible") ||
>> +	    of_device_is_compatible(np, "nvmem-cells"))
>> +		return of_device_ensure_probed(parent);
>> +
>> +	return of_device_ensure_probed(np);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_partition_ensure_probed);

Thanks,
Ahmad

>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> index ab737629325a..78b8a31331db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ int of_device_ensure_probed(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>>  	struct device *dev;
>>  
>> -	if (!deep_probe_is_supported())
>> +	if (!np || !deep_probe_is_supported())
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>>  	dev = of_device_create_on_demand(np);
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |




  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-31 14:59 [PATCH 00/18] state: allow lookup of barebox state partition by Type GUID Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 01/18] common: partitions: decouple from EFI GUID definition Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 02/18] efi: define efi_guid_t as 32-bit aligned guid_t Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 03/18] cdev: fix for_each_cdev macro Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 15:37   ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 04/18] of: partition: support of_partition_ensure_probed on parent device Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:30   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  4:48     ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 05/18] of: of_path: always call of_partition_ensure_probed before resolving Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:34   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  7:00   ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 06/18] driver: add new cdev_is_partition helper Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:36   ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 07/18] commands: stat: remove code duplication for type info Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:44   ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 08/18] cdev: use more descriptive struct cdev::diskuuid/partuuid Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:56   ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 09/18] cdev: record whether partition is parsed from OF Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:04   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-06 19:31     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  8:03   ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 10/18] cdev: have devfs_add_partition return existing identical partition, not NULL Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:23   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  4:56     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  7:32       ` Sascha Hauer
2023-06-01  8:26       ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  7:36   ` Sascha Hauer
2023-06-07  8:06     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 11/18] block: parse partition table on block device registration Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:25   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  7:42   ` Sascha Hauer
2023-06-01  8:33     ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-06 19:30     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  8:24   ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-06-01  8:31     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 10:33       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 12/18] common: partitions: record whether disk is GPT or MBR partitioned Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:33   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  5:08     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  5:58       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  8:19       ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 10:40         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 13/18] block: add cdev_is_block_(device,partition,disk) helpers Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:35   ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 14/18] of: export new of_cdev_find helper Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:41   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  8:41   ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 15/18] state: factor device path lookup into helper function Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:54   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  5:14     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] cdev: use cdev::dos_partition_type only if cdev_is_mbr_partitioned Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 18:54   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  5:30     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] common: partitions: efi: record type UUID in cdev Ahmad Fatoum
     [not found]   ` <20230531193130.fgmvxm27dh3gbvhh@pengutronix.de>
2023-06-06 19:28     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-07  8:55       ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 18/18] state: allow lookup of barebox state partition by Type GUID Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 20:01   ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01  5:49     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  8:11       ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 10:44         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01  8:05   ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0166cc41-dd9b-728c-a478-85bb8ec5b196@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox