[PATCH 01/18] of: of_copy_node(): Copy phandles as well

[Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>]

of_copy_node() has to copy the phandles as well, because otherwise
the phandles in the copied tree become invalid.

This is not entirely correct because when of_copy_node() is used to
copy one tree as a subtree of another tree then we might get duplicated
phandles which will result in a corrupted tree. This is also an issue
already without this patch, because the phandle of a node is not only
stored in the phandle member of a struct device_node, but also as a
separate phandle property in the tree itself. The phandle property is
copied before this patch, so we can equally well also copy the phandle
member of struct device_node.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/of/base.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 193bae7fa0..1434f39ad1 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -2409,6 +2409,7 @@ struct device_node *of_copy_node(struct device_node *parent, const struct device
 	struct property *pp;
 
 	np = of_new_node(parent, other->name);
+	np->phandle = other->phandle;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(pp, &other->properties, list)
 		of_new_property(np, pp->name, pp->value, pp->length);
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox