From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: Matthias Fend <matthias.fend@emfend.at>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: One barebox image for multiple boards
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 10:07:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220516080753.GG25578@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a73d1cf7-7548-3439-4369-8da061fad5ca@emfend.at>
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 02:10:32PM +0200, Matthias Fend wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> Am 13.05.2022 um 13:00 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:55:02AM +0200, Matthias Fend wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a solution to support multiple boards with just one barebox
> > > image. The few core components that are relevant for barebox are the same on
> > > all boards, so that the same barebox image runs on all boards. It is
> > > possible to dynamically detect the board type inside barebox, but as this
> > > requires some infrastructure it is not possible during lowlevel init. So
> > > basically Barebox should boot with a minimal core device tree, detect the
> > > board type and then use the corresponding device tree of the detected board.
> > > Something similar to arch/arm/boards/stm32mp15xx-dkx/lowlevel.c but not at
> > > low level.
> >
> > Do you even need the full device tree in barebox? The minimal core
> > device tree might be enough for barebox and only the kernel is then
> > booted with the full device tree.
>
> If there is no trick to changing the used device tree at boardlevel init,
> then this might be a possibility.
Replacing the live tree after it has been partly probed already is
dangerous and barebox is not really prepared for that.
> The core device tree might not be as minimal then and in exceptional cases
> minor fixups in the board code will be needed, but I think it could work.
>
> In such a case, how should one ensure that the appropriate blspec entry is
> booted? Maybe by simply replacing/updating the compatible string in the live
> device tree after the board was detected?
As it happens Oleksij has just introduced of_prepend_machine_compatible()
exactly for this usecase. You can find it in current next branch.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 8:55 Matthias Fend
2022-05-13 10:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-13 12:08 ` Matthias Fend
2022-05-13 12:20 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-05-13 18:02 ` Trent Piepho
2022-05-13 12:23 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-13 11:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-13 12:10 ` Matthias Fend
2022-05-16 8:07 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2022-05-19 9:25 ` Matthias Fend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220516080753.GG25578@pengutronix.de \
--to=sha@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.fend@emfend.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox