mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: overlay: fix overly strict check for symbols
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:25:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220930122539.GA986@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220926100610.1457821-1-michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:06:10PM +0200, Michael Riesch wrote:
> The recent patch "of: overlay: improve error handling in
> of_overlay_apply_tree" introduced overly strict checks for symbols
> in the root device tree and the overlay. However, it is legal for
> both to have no symbols. Fix the checks in order to implement the
> status quo.
> 
> Fixes: bc475fd88810 ("of: overlay: improve error handling in of_overlay_apply_tree")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
> ---
>  drivers/of/overlay.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks

Sascha

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> index 0fc440fdcf..9d112b67f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> @@ -131,12 +131,12 @@ static int of_overlay_apply_symbols(struct device_node *root,
>  
>  	if (!overlay_symbols) {
>  		pr_debug("overlay doesn't have a __symbols__ node\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!root_symbols) {
>  		pr_info("root doesn't have a __symbols__ node\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(prop, &overlay_symbols->properties, list) {
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-30 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-26 10:06 Michael Riesch
2022-09-26 10:26 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-09-30 12:25 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220930122539.GA986@pengutronix.de \
    --to=sha@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox