mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mci: add eMMC DDR52 support
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:27:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230418072712.pijqhlrlcyrkzoiy@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417164255.1070012-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

Hi Ahmad,

On 23-04-17, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> The maximum card frequency that can be configured by barebox currently
> is 50MHz for SD and 52MHz for eMMC. Higher speed modes require runtime
> voltage switching or tuning sequences, which are not yet implemented.
> 
> Only exception is eMMC's DDR52: This mode was first introduced with
> MMC 4.4 and can be used even at 3.3V.

Nice :)

> This commit adds DDR52 support to the core. This introduces no functional
> change, because host controllers must opt-in by setting the appropriate
> host capabilities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/mci.h          | 19 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> index f647cae8203b..86f468edfea6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static int mci_set_blocklen(struct mci *mci, unsigned len)
>  {
>  	struct mci_cmd cmd;
>  
> +	if (mci->host->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	mci_setup_cmd(&cmd, MMC_CMD_SET_BLOCKLEN, len, MMC_RSP_R1);
>  	return mci_send_cmd(mci, &cmd, NULL);
>  }
> @@ -649,11 +652,15 @@ static int mmc_change_freq(struct mci *mci)
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* High Speed is set, there are two types: 52MHz and 26MHz */
> -	if (cardtype & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52)
> -		mci->card_caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED_52MHZ | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> -	else
> -		mci->card_caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> +	mci->card_caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> +
> +	/* High Speed is set, there are three types: 26MHz, 52MHz, 52MHz DDR */
> +	if (cardtype & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52) {
> +		mci->card_caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED_52MHZ;
> +
> +		if (cardtype & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_8V)
> +			mci->card_caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_3_3V_DDR | MMC_CAP_MMC_1_8V_DDR;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_BOOT_PARTITIONS) &&
>  			mci->ext_csd[EXT_CSD_REV] >= 3 && mci->ext_csd[EXT_CSD_BOOT_SIZE_MULT]) {
> @@ -1170,15 +1177,20 @@ static int mci_startup_sd(struct mci *mci)
>  static int mci_startup_mmc(struct mci *mci)
>  {
>  	struct mci_host *host = mci->host;
> +	enum mci_timing timing_orig;
>  	int err;
>  	int idx = 0;
>  	static unsigned ext_csd_bits[] = {
>  		EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4,
>  		EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8,
> +		EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4,
> +		EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8,
>  	};
>  	static unsigned bus_widths[] = {
>  		MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4,
>  		MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8,
> +		MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4,
> +		MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8,

This is duplicated or should it be MMC_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4/8?

>  	};
>  
>  	/* if possible, speed up the transfer */
> @@ -1191,6 +1203,8 @@ static int mci_startup_mmc(struct mci *mci)
>  		host->timing = MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS;
>  	}
>  
> +	timing_orig = host->timing;
> +
>  	mci_set_clock(mci, mci->tran_speed);
>  
>  	if (!(host->host_caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA)))
> @@ -1205,6 +1219,9 @@ static int mci_startup_mmc(struct mci *mci)
>  	if (host->host_caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA)
>  		idx = 1;
>  
> +	if (mci_caps(mci) & MMC_CAP_MMC_1_8V_DDR)
> +		idx += 2;
> +
>  	for (; idx >= 0; idx--) {
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -1221,11 +1238,25 @@ static int mci_startup_mmc(struct mci *mci)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		if (ext_csd_bits[idx] & EXT_CSD_DDR_FLAG)
> +			host->timing = MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52;
> +		else
> +			host->timing = timing_orig;
> +
> +		dev_dbg(&mci->dev, "attempting buswidth %u%s\n", bus_widths[idx],
> +			mci_timing_is_ddr(host->timing) ? " (DDR)" : "");
> +
>  		mci_set_bus_width(mci, bus_widths[idx]);
>  
>  		err = mmc_compare_ext_csds(mci, bus_widths[idx]);
> -		if (!err)
> -			break;
> +		if (!err) {
> +			if (host->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) {
> +				mci->read_bl_len = SECTOR_SIZE;
> +				mci->write_bl_len = SECTOR_SIZE;
> +			}
> +
> +			return 0;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return err;
> @@ -1654,6 +1685,8 @@ static const char *mci_timing_tostr(unsigned timing)
>  		return "MMC HS";
>  	case MMC_TIMING_SD_HS:
>  		return "SD HS";
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52:
> +		return "MMC DDR52";
>  	default:
>  		return "unknown"; /* shouldn't happen */
>  	}
> @@ -1661,12 +1694,15 @@ static const char *mci_timing_tostr(unsigned timing)
>  
>  static void mci_print_caps(unsigned caps)
>  {
> -	printf("  capabilities: %s%s%s%s%s\n",
> +	printf("  capabilities: %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
>  		caps & MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA ? "4bit " : "",
>  		caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA ? "8bit " : "",
>  		caps & MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED ? "sd-hs " : "",
>  		caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED ? "mmc-hs " : "",
> -		caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED_52MHZ ? "mmc-52MHz " : "");
> +		caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED_52MHZ ? "mmc-52MHz " : "",
> +		caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_3_3V_DDR ? "ddr-3.3v " : "",
> +		caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_1_8V_DDR ? "ddr-1.8v " : "",
> +		caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_1_2V_DDR ? "ddr-1.2v " : "");

At the moment we only report what barebox does support, ddr-1.8v and
ddr-1.2v isn't supported. Do we really want to report this?

Regards,
  Marco

>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/mci.h b/include/mci.h
> index d356f071f7f2..88712c35492e 100644
> --- a/include/mci.h
> +++ b/include/mci.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@
>  #define MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED		(1 << 3)
>  #define MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED		(1 << 4)
>  #define MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED_52MHZ	(1 << 5)
> +#define MMC_CAP_MMC_3_3V_DDR		(1 << 7)	/* Host supports eMMC DDR 3.3V */
> +#define MMC_CAP_MMC_1_8V_DDR		(1 << 8)	/* Host supports eMMC DDR 1.8V */
> +#define MMC_CAP_MMC_1_2V_DDR		(1 << 9)	/* Host supports eMMC DDR 1.2V */
> +#define MMC_CAP_DDR			(MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR | MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR | \
> +					 MMC_CAP_1_2V_DDR)
>  /* Mask of all caps for bus width */
>  #define MMC_CAP_BIT_DATA_MASK		(MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA)
>  
> @@ -308,6 +313,7 @@
>  #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8	2	/* Card is in 8 bit mode */
>  #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4	5	/* Card is in 4 bit DDR mode */
>  #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8	6	/* Card is in 8 bit DDR mode */
> +#define EXT_CSD_DDR_FLAG	BIT(2)	/* Flag for DDR mode */
>  
>  #define R1_ILLEGAL_COMMAND		(1 << 22)
>  #define R1_STATUS(x)			(x & 0xFFF9A000)
> @@ -410,6 +416,19 @@ enum mci_timing {
>  	MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400	= 8,
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool mci_timing_is_ddr(enum mci_timing timing)
> +{
> +	switch (timing) {
> +	case MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400:
> +		return true;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  struct mci_ios {
>  	unsigned int	clock;			/* clock rate */
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 16:42 Ahmad Fatoum
2023-04-17 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] mci: imx-esdhc: add uSDHC eMMC DDR52 supprot Ahmad Fatoum
2023-04-18  7:32   ` Marco Felsch
2023-04-18  7:27 ` Marco Felsch [this message]
2023-04-18  7:36   ` [PATCH 1/2] mci: add eMMC DDR52 support Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230418072712.pijqhlrlcyrkzoiy@pengutronix.de \
    --to=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox