mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: Renaud Barbier <Renaud.Barbier@ametek.com>,
	Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: LS1021A performance
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:17:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bdf136861036d5c9362360db82ea153d576ec3c.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR07MB566562459F73E606BF3BB629EC8E9@BL0PR07MB5665.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Renaud,

Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 13:31 +0000 schrieb Renaud Barbier:
> 
>  
> > Can you compare SHA256 instead and see if the difference is still as stark?
> > Make sure that CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA256_ARM is enabled.
> The SHA256 is enabled. SHA256 on a 1 MB file:
> Barebox: 843ms
> Linux: 
> [root@openware]# time sha256sum /tmp/mtd0
> eef67a3327e3eaa50ee7b1dad87901465f00d76a6308e360a2fedab82c79f493  /tmp/mtd0
> 
> real    0m0.059s
> user    0m0.056s
> sys     0m0.001s
> 
> On another note, the boot loader using the LS1021A is much slower than using the PPC P1014.
> I compare those two as we used the LS1021A as a replacement for P1014 on a board (same peripherals, same boot sequence)
> The P1014 reach the prompt in 200ms while the LS1021 takes 700ms.
> 
> Also, I noticed that the pageflags is different for the DDR memory on Barebox and Linux as seen by the Lauterbach:
> Barebox: write-back/no allocate
> Linux : Inner:write-back/allocate outer: write-back/allocate
> Could that mean the L2 cache Is not used?
> > 
> > Do barebox and Linux run at the same CPU frequency?
> According to the Lauterbach, clock ratio have not changed in the clocking registers
> > 

As the LS1021A is based on a Cortex A7 your board lowlevel init needs
to call cortex_a7_lowlevel_init() for the caches to work properly.

It's probably a good idea to add a ls1021 lowlevel init function which
calls both of those functions together, like
imx6ul_cpu_lowlevel_init().

Regards,
Lucas

> > Cheers,
> > Ahmad
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Renaud
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> > Steuerwalder Str. 21                       |
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.pengutronix.de/__;!!HKOSU0g!D
> > 4uFepgqngTTHamr_7tlQeQoRJqSLL8npxTFBWFF-
> > kjpZuHgzi1quS6EE1ecjCKr_O_FJGPfkAnWXQyfONKJxqgrtQQ$   |
> > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30 11:34 Renaud Barbier
2023-03-30 11:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-03-30 13:31   ` Renaud Barbier
2023-03-30 14:17     ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2023-03-30 15:17       ` Renaud Barbier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6bdf136861036d5c9362360db82ea153d576ec3c.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Renaud.Barbier@ametek.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox