From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: anis chali <chalianis1@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc2: core: add no-csftrst-wait DT property
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:31:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7649db80-b719-4a06-a689-db8769375e89@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+1fyCM9baNW9ziBQSxO0AtkmWehBBoYEV_O2SwY3WQ5VV4Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 4/13/26 19:41, anis chali wrote:
> Hello Ahmad,
> Le lun. 13 avr. 2026 à 09:50, Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Anis,
>>
>> On 3/31/26 5:17 AM, chalianis1@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Chali Anis <chalianis1@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Some platforms (e.g. RPi4/bcm2711) do not deassert GRSTCTL_CSFTRST within
>>> the expected window but continue to operate correctly, causing probe to
>>> fail with ETIMEDOUT.
>>>
>>> Per the datasheet, GRSTCTL_CSFTRST is self-clearing but requires at least
>>> 3 PHY clocks after reset before any PHY domain access. Add a 1us delay to
>>> satisfy this requirement.
>>>
>>> Additionally introduce the 'no-csftrst-wait' devicetree property to skip
>>> polling for the bit to clear on platforms where the reset completes but the
>>> status bit is unreliable.
>>
>> I still wonder why there are no workarounds for this particular issue in
>> Linux or U-Boot. We seem to do something different when we run into this
>> reliably, but others don't?
>
> I checked the initialization sequence but I didn't
> find anything interesting.
>
>> I originally thought, it may be related to the version of the IP,
>> because both Linux and U-Boot have special handling for >= 4.20, but I
>> checked on my Rpi4 and DWC2 has v2.80 there (Synopsis ID 4f54280a)
>
> I implemented the u-boot logic but I had the same code with version check
> and I ended by removing it since it works for now without handling the versions.
ok, let's go with this workaround then.
>>> + if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "no-csftrst-wait")) {
>>
>> barebox-specific Device Tree properties should be documented in
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/.
> Okay, ack.
>
>> Alternatively, you can check of_machine_is_compatible("brcm,bcm2711")
> I choosed to add something in the device tree to not hard code a
> specific machine in
> dwc2 in that case we let the machine dts or users facing the same
> issue to add the dts
> property without even submitting patch, but if you prefer manage this
> with checking the
> machine compatible I can make the change???
Either is fine by me.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
>> Cheers,
>> Ahmad
>>
>>> + ret = dwc2_wait_bit_clear(dwc2, GRSTCTL, GRSTCTL_CSFTRST, 10000);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dwc2_warn(dwc2, "%s: Timeout! Waiting for Core Soft Reset\n",
>>> __func__);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (wait_for_host_mode)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K. | |
>> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>>
>
> Thank you for support.
>
> Anis
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 3:17 chalianis1
2026-03-31 3:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: bcm2711-rpi: enable USB and skip soft reset wait on RPi4 chalianis1
2026-04-13 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc2: core: add no-csftrst-wait DT property Ahmad Fatoum
2026-04-13 17:41 ` anis chali
2026-04-13 19:31 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2026-04-15 6:38 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7649db80-b719-4a06-a689-db8769375e89@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=chalianis1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox