mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: anis chali <chalianis1@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc2: core: add no-csftrst-wait DT property
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:31:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7649db80-b719-4a06-a689-db8769375e89@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+1fyCM9baNW9ziBQSxO0AtkmWehBBoYEV_O2SwY3WQ5VV4Ew@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 4/13/26 19:41, anis chali wrote:
> Hello Ahmad,
> Le lun. 13 avr. 2026 à 09:50, Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Anis,
>>
>> On 3/31/26 5:17 AM, chalianis1@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Chali Anis <chalianis1@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Some platforms (e.g. RPi4/bcm2711) do not deassert GRSTCTL_CSFTRST within
>>> the expected window but continue to operate correctly, causing probe to
>>> fail with ETIMEDOUT.
>>>
>>> Per the datasheet, GRSTCTL_CSFTRST is self-clearing but requires at least
>>> 3 PHY clocks after reset before any PHY domain access. Add a 1us delay to
>>> satisfy this requirement.
>>>
>>> Additionally introduce the 'no-csftrst-wait' devicetree property to skip
>>> polling for the bit to clear on platforms where the reset completes but the
>>> status bit is unreliable.
>>
>> I still wonder why there are no workarounds for this particular issue in
>> Linux or U-Boot. We seem to do something different when we run into this
>> reliably, but others don't?
> 
> I checked the initialization sequence but I didn't
> find anything interesting.
> 
>> I originally thought, it may be related to the version of the IP,
>> because both Linux and U-Boot have special handling for >= 4.20, but I
>> checked on my Rpi4 and DWC2 has v2.80 there (Synopsis ID 4f54280a)
> 
> I implemented the u-boot logic but I had the same code with version check
> and I ended by removing it since it works for now without handling the versions.

ok, let's go with this workaround then.

>>> +     if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "no-csftrst-wait")) {
>>
>> barebox-specific Device Tree properties should be documented in
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/.
> Okay, ack.
> 
>> Alternatively, you can check of_machine_is_compatible("brcm,bcm2711")
> I choosed to add something in the device tree to not hard code a
> specific machine in
> dwc2 in that case we let the machine dts or users facing the same
> issue to add the dts
> property without even submitting patch, but if you prefer manage this
> with checking the
> machine compatible I can make the change???

Either is fine by me.

Cheers,
Ahmad

> 
>> Cheers,
>> Ahmad
>>
>>> +             ret = dwc2_wait_bit_clear(dwc2, GRSTCTL, GRSTCTL_CSFTRST, 10000);
>>> +             if (ret) {
>>> +                     dwc2_warn(dwc2, "%s: Timeout! Waiting for Core Soft Reset\n",
>>>                               __func__);
>>> -             return ret;
>>> +                     return ret;
>>> +             }
>>>       }
>>>
>>>       if (wait_for_host_mode)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K.                  |                             |
>> Steuerwalder Str. 21              | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany         | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>>
> 
> Thank you for support.
> 
> Anis
> 


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-13 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31  3:17 chalianis1
2026-03-31  3:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: bcm2711-rpi: enable USB and skip soft reset wait on RPi4 chalianis1
2026-04-13 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc2: core: add no-csftrst-wait DT property Ahmad Fatoum
2026-04-13 17:41   ` anis chali
2026-04-13 19:31     ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2026-04-15  6:38     ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7649db80-b719-4a06-a689-db8769375e89@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=chalianis1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox