From: Trent Piepho <trent.piepho@igorinstitute.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Bring up all interfaces before going interactive
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:47:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMHeXxPJoHO6_eL9sf-_Fu+oqJQv278f9D8RifBkG2YV_yYYmw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220920074120.GF6477@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:41 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:20:53AM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 6:16 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > We could make the user experience even a bit better by doing this call
> > > before waiting for the autoboot timeout which then speeds up netboot a
> > > bit.
> >
> > The Linux phy driver almost invariably does not bother to avoid
> > resetting the network phy when not necessary. So if network
> > auto-negotiation is started in barebox, it will be reset and then
> > restarted shortly after in Linux. The link auto-negotiation impacts
> > the LAN's spanning tree if that is in use.
> >
> > So there is a drawback, besides the small added boot time to
> > initialize the network hardware, to adding an unneeded network restart
> > in Barebox in the case where interactive mode is not entered and
> > network boot is not used.
>
> So is this a vote to only do the autonegotiaton when going interactive
> in barebox, or a vote to do autonegotiation only when the network is
> being used in barebox?
I would vote to only do it when going interactive.
It also seems reasonable to bring the network up quickly when network
booting, but I think determining if the system will network boot,
before actually trying to boot, is probably unreasonably difficult to
do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-16 12:49 Sascha Hauer
2022-09-16 13:16 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-09-19 17:20 ` Trent Piepho
2022-09-20 7:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-09-20 9:47 ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2022-09-22 9:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-09-20 8:22 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMHeXxPJoHO6_eL9sf-_Fu+oqJQv278f9D8RifBkG2YV_yYYmw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=trent.piepho@igorinstitute.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox