mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
	barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] mci: sdhci: add tuning support
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:32:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd549ca7-b40a-4724-acfe-acaf30b1b025@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308-v2024-02-0-topic-arasan-hs200-support-v1-10-6d50c90485f3@pengutronix.de>

Hello Steffen,

On 08.03.24 12:17, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> The arasan SDHCI driver doesn't use MMC tuning but SDHCI tuning. Both
> are not supported yet in barebox.
> Add SDHCI tuning support from linux v6.7.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mci/sdhci.c | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/mci/sdhci.h |  24 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/sdhci.c b/drivers/mci/sdhci.c
> index edb819d66d..62e6443e64 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mci/sdhci.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,196 @@
>  
>  #include "sdhci.h"
>  
> +#define MAX_TUNING_LOOP 40
> +#define  SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(dma, blksz) (((dma & 0x7) << 12) | (blksz & 0xFFF))
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCI_TUNING

As with mci-core, use only IS_ENABLED() for compile coverage.


> +static int sdhci_send_command_retry(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> +	int timeout = 10;
> +
> +	while ((sdhci_read32(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) & SDHCI_CMD_INHIBIT_CMD)) {
> +		if (!timeout--)
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> +		mdelay(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	return host->mci->send_cmd(host->mci, cmd, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We use sdhci_send_tuning() because mmc_send_tuning() is not a good fit. SDHCI
> + * tuning command does not have a data payload (or rather the hardware does it
> + * automatically) so mmc_send_tuning() will return -EIO. Also the tuning command
> + * interrupt setup is different to other commands and there is no timeout
> + * interrupt so special handling is needed.
> + */
> +static int sdhci_send_tuning(struct sdhci *host, u32 opcode)
> +{
> +	struct mci_cmd cmd = {};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cmd.cmdidx = opcode;
> +	cmd.resp_type = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In response to CMD19, the card sends 64 bytes of tuning
> +	 * block to the Host Controller. So we set the block size
> +	 * to 64 here.
> +	 */
> +	if (cmd.cmdidx == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200 &&
> +	    host->mci->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8) {
> +		sdhci_write16(host, SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, 128));
> +	} else {
> +		sdhci_write16(host, SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, 64));
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = sdhci_send_command_retry(host, &cmd);
> +
> +	udelay(100);

IIRC, this was debugging left-over in case Linux context switch here influenced
the result. I think this can be dropped.

> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_end_tuning(struct sdhci *host)
> +{
> +	sdhci_write32(host, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE, host->tuning_old_ier);
> +	sdhci_write32(host, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE, host->tuning_old_sig);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_start_tuning(struct sdhci *host)
> +{
> +	u16 ctrl;
> +
> +	ctrl = sdhci_read16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +	ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> +	sdhci_write16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2, ctrl);
> +
> +	mdelay(1);
> +
> +	host->tuning_old_ier = sdhci_read32(host, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
> +	host->tuning_old_sig = sdhci_read32(host, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
> +
> +	sdhci_write32(host, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL);
> +	sdhci_write32(host, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_reset_tuning(struct sdhci *host)
> +{
> +	u16 ctrl;
> +
> +	ctrl = sdhci_read16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +	ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> +	ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> +	sdhci_write16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2, ctrl);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_abort_tuning(struct sdhci *host, u32 opcode)
> +{
> +	sdhci_reset_tuning(host);
> +
> +	sdhci_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD);
> +	sdhci_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_DATA);

I fear this might get "cleaned up" in future to be SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA,
which is wrong. Could you port sdhci_reset_for_reason over and use it?

> +
> +	sdhci_end_tuning(host);
> +
> +	mci_send_abort_tuning(host->mci->mci, opcode);
> +}
> +
> +static int __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci *host, u32 opcode)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Issue opcode repeatedly till Execute Tuning is set to 0 or the number
> +	 * of loops reaches tuning loop count.

Please add to comment: Some controllers are known to always require 40 iterations.

> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < host->tuning_loop_count; i++) {
> +		u16 ctrl;
> +
> +		ret = sdhci_send_tuning(host, opcode);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			sdhci_abort_tuning(host, opcode);
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Spec does not require a delay between tuning cycles */
> +		if (host->tuning_delay > 0)
> +			mdelay(host->tuning_delay);
> +
> +		ctrl = sdhci_read16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +		if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING)) {
> +			if (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
> +				return 0; /* Success! */
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&host->mci->mci->dev, "Tuning timeout, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n");
> +	sdhci_reset_tuning(host);
> +	return -EAGAIN;
> +}
> +
> +int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci *sdhci, u32 opcode)
> +{
> +	struct mci_host *host = sdhci->mci;
> +	int err = 0;
> +	unsigned int tuning_count = 0;
> +
> +	if (sdhci->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
> +		tuning_count = sdhci->tuning_count;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The Host Controller needs tuning in case of SDR104 and DDR50
> +	 * mode, and for SDR50 mode when Use Tuning for SDR50 is set in
> +	 * the Capabilities register.
> +	 * If the Host Controller supports the HS200 mode then the
> +	 * tuning function has to be executed.
> +	 */
> +	switch (host->timing) {
> +	/* HS400 tuning is done in HS200 mode */
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400:
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200:
> +		break;
> +
> +	case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50:
> +		break;
> +
> +	case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50:
> +		fallthrough;
> +
> +	default:
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (host->platform_execute_tuning) {
> +		err = host->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
> +		goto out;
> +	}

As mentioned in previous patch, this should be sdhci->platform_execute_tuning.

> +
> +	if (sdhci->tuning_delay < 0)
> +		sdhci->tuning_delay = opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
> +
> +	sdhci_start_tuning(sdhci);
> +
> +	sdhci->tuning_err = __sdhci_execute_tuning(sdhci, opcode);
> +
> +	sdhci_end_tuning(sdhci);
> +out:
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_execute_tuning);
> +#endif
> +
>  void sdhci_read_response(struct sdhci *sdhci, struct mci_cmd *cmd)
>  {
>  	if (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_136) {
> @@ -50,7 +240,12 @@ void sdhci_set_cmd_xfer_mode(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd,
>  
>  	*command |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX(cmd->cmdidx);
>  
> -	if (data) {
> +	if (cmd->cmdidx == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK ||
> +	    cmd->cmdidx == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200) {
> +		*command |= SDHCI_DATA_PRESENT;
> +		*xfer = SDHCI_DATA_TO_HOST;
> +
> +	} else if (data) {
>  		*command |= SDHCI_DATA_PRESENT;
>  
>  		*xfer |= SDHCI_BLOCK_COUNT_EN;
> @@ -111,6 +306,31 @@ void sdhci_set_bus_width(struct sdhci *host, int width)
>  	sdhci_write8(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL, ctrl);
>  }
>  
> +static void sdhci_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci *host, unsigned timing)
> +{
> +	u16 ctrl_2;
> +
> +	ctrl_2 = sdhci_read16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +	/* Select Bus Speed Mode for host */
> +	ctrl_2 &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK;
> +	if ((timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200) ||
> +	    (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104))
> +		ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104;
> +	else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR12)
> +		ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR12;
> +	else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25)
> +		ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR25;
> +	else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50)
> +		ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50;
> +	else if ((timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50) ||
> +		 (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52))
> +		ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_DDR50;
> +	else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400)
> +		ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_HS400; /* Non-standard */
> +	sdhci_write16(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2, ctrl_2);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_set_uhs_signaling);
> +
>  static inline bool sdhci_can_64bit_dma(struct sdhci *host)
>  {
>  	/*
> @@ -567,6 +787,8 @@ void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci *host, unsigned int clock, unsigned int input_
>  
>  	host->mci->clock = 0;
>  
> +	sdhci_set_uhs_signaling(host, host->mci->timing);
> +
>  	sdhci_wait_idle(host, NULL);
>  
>  	sdhci_write16(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0);
> @@ -695,5 +917,25 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci *host)
>  	if (sdhci_can_64bit_dma(host))
>  		host->flags |= SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
>  
> +	if ((mci->caps2 & (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_8V)))
> +		host->flags |= SDHCI_SIGNALING_180;
> +
> +	host->tuning_delay = -1;
> +	host->tuning_loop_count = MAX_TUNING_LOOP;
> +
> +	/* Initial value for re-tuning timer count */
> +	host->tuning_count = FIELD_GET(SDHCI_RETUNING_TIMER_COUNT_MASK,
> +				       host->caps1);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In case Re-tuning Timer is not disabled, the actual value of
> +	 * re-tuning timer will be 2 ^ (n - 1).
> +	 */
> +	if (host->tuning_count)
> +		host->tuning_count = 1 << (host->tuning_count - 1);
> +
> +	/* Re-tuning mode supported by the Host Controller */
> +	host->tuning_mode = FIELD_GET(SDHCI_RETUNING_MODE_MASK, host->caps1);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/sdhci.h b/drivers/mci/sdhci.h
> index 2139498855..80916e670f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mci/sdhci.h
> @@ -28,9 +28,11 @@
>  #define SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE					0x0c
>  #define  SDHCI_MULTIPLE_BLOCKS			BIT(5)
>  #define  SDHCI_DATA_TO_HOST			BIT(4)
> +#define  SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD12			BIT(3)
>  #define  SDHCI_BLOCK_COUNT_EN			BIT(1)
>  #define  SDHCI_DMA_EN				BIT(0)
>  #define SDHCI_COMMAND						0x0e
> +#define  SDHCI_MAKE_CMD(c, f) 			(((c & 0xff) << 8) | (f & 0xff))
>  #define  SDHCI_CMD_INDEX(c)			(((c) & 0x3f) << 8)
>  #define  SDHCI_COMMAND_CMDTYP_SUSPEND		(1 << 6)
>  #define  SDHCI_COMMAND_CMDTYP_RESUME		(2 << 6)
> @@ -121,6 +123,15 @@
>  #define SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE					0x38
>  #define SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR__HOST_CONTROL2				0x3C
>  #define SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2					0x3E
> +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK			GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define   SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR12			0x0
> +#define   SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR25			0x1
> +#define   SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50			0x2
> +#define   SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104			0x3
> +#define   SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_DDR50			0x4
> +#define   SDHCI_CTRL_HS400			0x5 /* Non-standard */
> +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING			BIT(6)
> +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK			BIT(7)
>  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_64BIT_ADDR			BIT(13)
>  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_V4_MODE			BIT(12)
>  #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES					0x40
> @@ -230,6 +241,18 @@ struct sdhci {
>  	bool read_caps;	/* Capability flags have been read */
>  	u32 sdma_boundary;
>  
> +	unsigned int		tuning_count;	/* Timer count for re-tuning */
> +	unsigned int		tuning_mode;	/* Re-tuning mode supported by host */
> +	unsigned int		tuning_err;	/* Error code for re-tuning */
> +#define SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1	0
> +#define SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_2	1
> +#define SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3	2
> +	/* Delay (ms) between tuning commands */
> +	int			tuning_delay;
> +	int			tuning_loop_count;
> +	int			tuning_old_ier;
> +	int			tuning_old_sig;
> +
>  	struct mci_host	*mci;
>  };
>  
> @@ -282,6 +305,7 @@ static inline void sdhci_write8(struct sdhci *host, int reg, u32 val)
>  }
>  
>  #define SDHCI_NO_DMA DMA_ERROR_CODE
> +int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci *sdhci, u32 opcode);
>  int sdhci_wait_idle(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd);
>  int sdhci_wait_for_done(struct sdhci *host, u32 mask);
>  void sdhci_read_response(struct sdhci *host, struct mci_cmd *cmd);
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |




  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08 11:16 [PATCH 00/12] mci: add HS200 support for eMMCs Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-08 11:16 ` [PATCH 01/12] ARM: zynqmp: add sd_dll_reset call Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:43   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 02/12] zynqmp: firmware: add functions to set tap delay Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:43   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 03/12] mci: arasan: implement 25MHz quirk for zynqmp Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-12  8:34   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 04/12] mci: arasan: read clk phases from DT Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:16   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-11  8:44   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 05/12] mci: arasan: register sdcard/sampleclk Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:14   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 06/12] include: mci: sync mci_timing with linux Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:11   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 07/12] include: mci: add more EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_* Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:17   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 08/12] mci: core: parse more host capabilities from DT Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:23   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 09/12] mci: mci-core: add HS200 support Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-12  8:20   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 10/12] mci: sdhci: add tuning support Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-12  8:32   ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 11/12] mci: arasan-sdhci: add HS200 tuning support on ZynqMP Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-12  8:33   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-08 11:17 ` [PATCH 12/12] mci: arasan: use sdhci_wait_idle2 Steffen Trumtrar
2024-03-11  8:42   ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd549ca7-b40a-4724-acfe-acaf30b1b025@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox