Re: [PATCH 0/2] PBL: constructor fixes

["Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>]

On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 8/19/26 4:12 PM, Stefan Kerkmann wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Stefan Kerkmann (2):
> >       ARM/ARM64/RISC-V: pbl: guard constructor support
> >       ARM64: setup_c: abi safe link register storage
> 
> if these are applied after what's in next, we would have intermittent
> breakage when doing a bisect right?
> 
> I would suggest either turning these into fixups or just resend the
> whole series.

I just squashed them into the original commit. But next time, yes, you
can send --fixup patches for patches in next.

I just learned there's also --fixup=amend:<commit> for replacing the
original commit message along with the fixup. There's even
--fixup=reword:<commit> for just rewording the commit message without
changing the patch content.

Sascha

--
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |