mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>,
	Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] tlsf: fix sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(void *) assumption
Date: Tue,  4 Oct 2022 17:54:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221004155405.3458479-5-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221004155405.3458479-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

TLSF struct block_header_t doesn't describe a single block, but
instead its first member covers the previous block:

                              .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
                              |  prev_phys_block  |
    End of previous block --> |———————————————————| <-- Start of a free block
                              |       size        |
                              |— — — — — — — — — —|
                              | < Start of Data > |
                              '———————————————————'

This works because if the previous block is free, there is no harm in
using its last word to store the prev_phys_block.

We thus need pointer arithmetic to:

  - arrive from start of data to size, i.e. decrement offset
    by sizeof(size_t)

  - arrive from size to prev_phys_block, i.e. decrement offset
    by sizeof(struct block_header_t *)

Across the TLSF implementation, we conflate the two though and use
block_header_shift to mean both.  This works as long as
sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(struct block_header_t *), which is true
for both 32-bit and 64-bit configuration currently.

To facilitate having an 8-byte minimum allocation alignment for 32-bit
systems as well, we will increase sizeof(struct block_header_t::size)
to 8 bytes, which will break the implicit assumption. Fix it by adding
an additional const block_header_shift and use it where appropriate.

No functional change just yet.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 common/tlsf.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/tlsf.c b/common/tlsf.c
index f8892dafbb7f..83d469ae0a25 100644
--- a/common/tlsf.c
+++ b/common/tlsf.c
@@ -146,11 +146,12 @@ static const size_t block_header_prev_free_bit = 1 << 1;
 ** The size of the block header exposed to used blocks is the size field.
 ** The prev_phys_block field is stored *inside* the previous free block.
 */
+static const size_t block_header_shift = offsetof(block_header_t, size);
 static const size_t block_header_overhead = sizeof(size_t);
 
 /* User data starts directly after the size field in a used block. */
 static const size_t block_start_offset =
-	offsetof(block_header_t, size) + sizeof(size_t);
+	block_header_shift + block_header_overhead;
 
 /*
 ** A free block must be large enough to store its header minus the size of
@@ -258,7 +259,7 @@ static block_header_t* block_prev(const block_header_t* block)
 static block_header_t* block_next(const block_header_t* block)
 {
 	block_header_t* next = offset_to_block(block_to_ptr(block),
-		block_size(block) - block_header_overhead);
+		block_size(block) - block_header_shift);
 	tlsf_assert(!block_is_last(block));
 	return next;
 }
@@ -469,7 +470,7 @@ static block_header_t* block_split(block_header_t* block, size_t size)
 {
 	/* Calculate the amount of space left in the remaining block. */
 	block_header_t* remaining =
-		offset_to_block(block_to_ptr(block), size - block_header_overhead);
+		offset_to_block(block_to_ptr(block), size - block_header_shift);
 
 	const size_t remain_size = block_size(block) - (size + block_header_overhead);
 
@@ -735,7 +736,7 @@ void tlsf_walk_pool(pool_t pool, tlsf_walker walker, void* user)
 {
 	tlsf_walker pool_walker = walker ? walker : default_walker;
 	block_header_t* block =
-		offset_to_block(pool, -(int)block_header_overhead);
+		offset_to_block(pool, -(int)block_header_shift);
 
 	while (block && !block_is_last(block))
 	{
@@ -841,7 +842,7 @@ pool_t tlsf_add_pool(tlsf_t tlsf, void* mem, size_t bytes)
 	** so that the prev_phys_block field falls outside of the pool -
 	** it will never be used.
 	*/
-	block = offset_to_block(mem, -(tlsfptr_t)block_header_overhead);
+	block = offset_to_block(mem, -(tlsfptr_t)block_header_shift);
 	block_set_size(block, pool_bytes);
 	block_set_free(block);
 	block_set_prev_used(block);
@@ -859,7 +860,7 @@ pool_t tlsf_add_pool(tlsf_t tlsf, void* mem, size_t bytes)
 void tlsf_remove_pool(tlsf_t tlsf, pool_t pool)
 {
 	control_t* control = tlsf_cast(control_t*, tlsf);
-	block_header_t* block = offset_to_block(pool, -(int)block_header_overhead);
+	block_header_t* block = offset_to_block(pool, -(int)block_header_shift);
 
 	int fl = 0, sl = 0;
 
@@ -982,7 +983,7 @@ void* tlsf_memalign(tlsf_t tlsf, size_t align, size_t size)
 	block = block_locate_free(control, aligned_size);
 
 	/* This can't be a static assert. */
-	tlsf_assert(sizeof(block_header_t) == block_size_min + block_header_overhead);
+	tlsf_assert(sizeof(block_header_t) == block_size_min + block_header_shift);
 
 	if (block)
 	{
-- 
2.30.2




  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-04 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-04 15:53 [PATCH 0/9] tlsf: use 8-byte alignment for normal malloc allocations Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] test: include <linux/printk.h> Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] tlsf: use bselftest for testing ffs/fls Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] tlsf: ensure malloc pool is aligned Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] tlsf: decouple maximum allocation size from sizeof(size_t) Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] tlsf: use 8-byte alignment for normal malloc allocations Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] common: malloc: ensure alignment is always at least 8 byte Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] test: self: refactor to allow alignment check Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] test: self: malloc: fix memory leaks Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 16:23 ` [PATCH 0/9] tlsf: use 8-byte alignment for normal malloc allocations Enrico Scholz
2022-10-04 16:34   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-14  8:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-10-20 13:11   ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221004155405.3458479-5-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox