mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] tlsf: use 8-byte alignment for normal malloc allocations
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 18:23:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyr0znzhfm.fsf@ensc-pc.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221004155405.3458479-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> (Ahmad Fatoum's message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:53:58 +0200")

Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> writes:

> TLSF currently uses only 4-byte alignment on 32-bit platforms, which isn't
> enough for ldrd/strd on ARMv7. This series reworks TLSF a bit, so we always
> have at least 8 byte alignment.  dlmalloc already has 8 byte alignment
> minimum, so nothing to do there.

I am wondering whether alignment should be increased on 64 bit archs to
16 bytes as well.  ARMv8 spec [1] says

| exclusive pair access must be aligned to twice the data size, that is,
| 128 bits for a pair of 64-bit values.

A github issue [2] mentions this alignment too.


> While this fixes real issues like what Enrico ran into, I'd suggest we only
> this be taken into next only after v2022.10.0 is tagged,

This is ok for me; the issue disappeared with reverting the zstd patch.



Enrico

Footnotes:
[1]  https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/An-Introduction-to-the-ARMv8-Instruction-Sets/The-ARMv8-instruction-sets/Addressing

[2]  https://github.com/mattconte/tlsf/issues/16

-- 
SIGMA Chemnitz GmbH       Registergericht:   Amtsgericht Chemnitz HRB 1750
Am Erlenwald 13           Geschaeftsfuehrer: Grit Freitag, Frank Pyritz
09128 Chemnitz



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-04 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-04 15:53 Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] test: include <linux/printk.h> Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] tlsf: use bselftest for testing ffs/fls Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] tlsf: ensure malloc pool is aligned Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] tlsf: fix sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(void *) assumption Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] tlsf: decouple maximum allocation size from sizeof(size_t) Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] tlsf: use 8-byte alignment for normal malloc allocations Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] common: malloc: ensure alignment is always at least 8 byte Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] test: self: refactor to allow alignment check Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] test: self: malloc: fix memory leaks Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-04 16:23 ` Enrico Scholz [this message]
2022-10-04 16:34   ` [PATCH 0/9] tlsf: use 8-byte alignment for normal malloc allocations Ahmad Fatoum
2022-10-14  8:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-10-20 13:11   ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=lyr0znzhfm.fsf@ensc-pc.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de \
    --to=enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox