* [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument
@ 2022-12-01 13:38 Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-02 8:50 ` Marco Felsch
2022-12-02 8:53 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2022-12-01 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox; +Cc: Ahmad Fatoum
regulator_get calls either of_regulator_get or dev_regulator_get, both
of which accept a supply parameter. Only dev_regulator_get gracefully
handles a NULL supply by considering all registered regulators.
of_regulator_get on the other hand, will complain at debug level,
before returning NULL:
uart-pl011 fe201000.serial@7e201000.of: No <NULL>-supply node found,
using dummy regulator
Avoid this message by skipping of_regulator_get if no supply was found
and directly call dev_regulator_get.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 4876f0f44bdd..d25aba38c3e2 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ struct regulator *regulator_get(struct device_d *dev, const char *supply)
struct regulator *r;
int ret;
- if (dev->device_node) {
+ if (dev->device_node && supply) {
ri = of_regulator_get(dev, supply);
if (IS_ERR(ri))
return ERR_CAST(ri);
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument
2022-12-01 13:38 [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2022-12-02 8:50 ` Marco Felsch
2022-12-02 9:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-02 8:53 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2022-12-02 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ahmad Fatoum; +Cc: barebox
On 22-12-01, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> regulator_get calls either of_regulator_get or dev_regulator_get, both
> of which accept a supply parameter. Only dev_regulator_get gracefully
> handles a NULL supply by considering all registered regulators.
Wouldn't it be better to align of_regulator_get behaviour with
dev_regulator_get?
> of_regulator_get on the other hand, will complain at debug level,
> before returning NULL:
>
> uart-pl011 fe201000.serial@7e201000.of: No <NULL>-supply node found,
> using dummy regulator
>
> Avoid this message by skipping of_regulator_get if no supply was found
> and directly call dev_regulator_get.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 4876f0f44bdd..d25aba38c3e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ struct regulator *regulator_get(struct device_d *dev, const char *supply)
> struct regulator *r;
> int ret;
>
> - if (dev->device_node) {
> + if (dev->device_node && supply) {
> ri = of_regulator_get(dev, supply);
> if (IS_ERR(ri))
> return ERR_CAST(ri);
Nevertheless the change is correct, so:
Reviewed-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Regards,
Marco
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument
2022-12-01 13:38 [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-02 8:50 ` Marco Felsch
@ 2022-12-02 8:53 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2022-12-02 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ahmad Fatoum; +Cc: barebox
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 02:38:53PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> regulator_get calls either of_regulator_get or dev_regulator_get, both
> of which accept a supply parameter. Only dev_regulator_get gracefully
> handles a NULL supply by considering all registered regulators.
>
> of_regulator_get on the other hand, will complain at debug level,
> before returning NULL:
>
> uart-pl011 fe201000.serial@7e201000.of: No <NULL>-supply node found,
> using dummy regulator
>
> Avoid this message by skipping of_regulator_get if no supply was found
> and directly call dev_regulator_get.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 4876f0f44bdd..d25aba38c3e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ struct regulator *regulator_get(struct device_d *dev, const char *supply)
> struct regulator *r;
> int ret;
>
> - if (dev->device_node) {
> + if (dev->device_node && supply) {
> ri = of_regulator_get(dev, supply);
> if (IS_ERR(ri))
> return ERR_CAST(ri);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument
2022-12-02 8:50 ` Marco Felsch
@ 2022-12-02 9:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2022-12-02 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Felsch; +Cc: barebox
On 02.12.22 09:50, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 22-12-01, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> regulator_get calls either of_regulator_get or dev_regulator_get, both
>> of which accept a supply parameter. Only dev_regulator_get gracefully
>> handles a NULL supply by considering all registered regulators.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to align of_regulator_get behaviour with
> dev_regulator_get?
Nope, not specifying a supply id is legacy behavior. Consumers
should be expected to know the name of the supply they want to
control. In Linux, regulator_get(dev, NULL) is already an error.
>
>> of_regulator_get on the other hand, will complain at debug level,
>> before returning NULL:
>>
>> uart-pl011 fe201000.serial@7e201000.of: No <NULL>-supply node found,
>> using dummy regulator
>>
>> Avoid this message by skipping of_regulator_get if no supply was found
>> and directly call dev_regulator_get.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> index 4876f0f44bdd..d25aba38c3e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ struct regulator *regulator_get(struct device_d *dev, const char *supply)
>> struct regulator *r;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (dev->device_node) {
>> + if (dev->device_node && supply) {
>> ri = of_regulator_get(dev, supply);
>> if (IS_ERR(ri))
>> return ERR_CAST(ri);
>
> Nevertheless the change is correct, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-02 9:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-01 13:38 [PATCH] regulator: core: don't call of_regulator_get with NULL argument Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-02 8:50 ` Marco Felsch
2022-12-02 9:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-02 8:53 ` Sascha Hauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox