From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/10] clk: add Microchip LAN966X / LAN969X generic clock controller driver
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:58:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4gne72pfap26srdsgnlcpe7tk723xx64i7idfxjsuqlf2nqmox@hizzlzhfxnno> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612055930.635833-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Hi Oleksij,
thanks for your patch, please see below.
On 26-06-12, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Port the Microchip LAN966X Generic Clock Controller (GCK) driver from
> the Linux kernel. GCK generates and supplies clocks to peripherals on
> the LAN966X and LAN969X switch SoCs (UART, SDHCI, QSPI, SGPIO, ...).
>
> Ported from Linux drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c at tag v7.1-rc7
> Barebox-specific deltas:
> - probe() takes `struct device *` instead of `platform_device`
> - no devm_* - explicit kfree on probe failure
> - clk_parent_data carries both `.fw_name` (for Linux source-compat) and
> `.name` (used by barebox at register time, since barebox's clk
> framework does not resolve `fw_name` via clock-names).
> - Linux's `.determine_rate` is implemented here as `.round_rate`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c | 325 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 335 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> index d2a61329e125..fe7056f8971b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> @@ -84,4 +84,13 @@ config COMMON_CLK_GPIO
>
> source "drivers/clk/sifive/Kconfig"
>
> +config COMMON_CLK_LAN966X
> + bool "Generic Clock Controller driver for LAN966X SoC"
> + depends on OFDEVICE
> + depends on COMMON_CLK
> + help
> + Microchip LAN966X and LAN969X SoC Generic Clock Controller (GCK).
> + GCK generates and supplies clocks to various peripherals within the
> + SoC.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> index 4fda2c1e0dd3..d7e06de04230 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_SCMI) += clk-scmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_GPIO) += clk-gpio.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_CLK) += ti-sci-clk.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_LAN966X) += clk-lan966x.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c b/drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a2f43b2f8dce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Microchip LAN966x SoC Clock driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Microchip Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries
> + *
> + * Author: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>
> + *
> + * Ported from Linux drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c. Structure and identifiers
> + * are kept aligned with Linux so future fixes can be backported with
> + * minimal context churn.
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <driver.h>
> +#include <io.h>
> +#include <of.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +#define GCK_ENA BIT(0)
> +#define GCK_SRC_SEL GENMASK(9, 8)
> +#define GCK_PRESCALER GENMASK(23, 16)
> +
> +#define DIV_MAX 255
> +
> +static const char * const lan966x_clk_names[] = {
> + "qspi0", "qspi1", "qspi2", "sdmmc0",
> + "pi", "mcan0", "mcan1", "flexcom0",
> + "flexcom1", "flexcom2", "flexcom3",
> + "flexcom4", "timer1", "usb_refclk",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const lan969x_clk_names[] = {
> + "qspi0", "qspi2", "sdmmc0", "sdmmc1",
> + "mcan0", "mcan1", "flexcom0",
> + "flexcom1", "flexcom2", "flexcom3",
> + "timer1", "usb_refclk",
> +};
> +
> +struct lan966x_gck {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> +};
> +#define to_lan966x_gck(hw) container_of(hw, struct lan966x_gck, hw)
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data lan966x_gck_pdata[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "cpu", .name = "cpu-clk", },
> + { .fw_name = "ddr", .name = "ddr-clk", },
> + { .fw_name = "sys", .name = "fx100-clk", },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_init_data init = {
> + .parent_data = lan966x_gck_pdata,
> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(lan966x_gck_pdata),
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_gate_soc_desc {
> + const char *name;
> + int bit_idx;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_gate_soc_desc lan966x_clk_gate_desc[] = {
> + { "uhphs", 11 },
> + { "udphs", 10 },
> + { "mcramc", 9 },
> + { "hmatrix", 8 },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_gate_soc_desc lan969x_clk_gate_desc[] = {
> + { "usb_drd", 10 },
> + { "mcramc", 9 },
> + { "hmatrix", 8 },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +struct lan966x_match_data {
> + char *name;
> + const char * const *clk_name;
> + const struct clk_gate_soc_desc *clk_gate_desc;
> + u8 num_generic_clks;
> + u8 num_total_clks;
> +};
> +
> +static struct lan966x_match_data lan966x_desc = {
> + .name = "lan966x",
> + .clk_name = lan966x_clk_names,
> + .clk_gate_desc = lan966x_clk_gate_desc,
> + .num_total_clks = 18,
> + .num_generic_clks = 14,
> +};
> +
> +static struct lan966x_match_data lan969x_desc = {
> + .name = "lan969x",
> + .clk_name = lan969x_clk_names,
> + .clk_gate_desc = lan969x_clk_gate_desc,
> + .num_total_clks = 15,
> + .num_generic_clks = 12,
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clk_gate_lock);
> +static void __iomem *base;
This seems odd, is this also part of the Linux kernel? Furthermore it's
only used during lan966x_gck_clk_register().
> +static int lan966x_gck_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + val |= GCK_ENA;
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void lan966x_gck_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + val &= ~GCK_ENA;
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 div, val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + if (rate == 0 || parent_rate == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Set Prescalar */
> + div = parent_rate / rate;
> + val &= ~GCK_PRESCALER;
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(GCK_PRESCALER, (div - 1));
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long lan966x_gck_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 div, val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + div = FIELD_GET(GCK_PRESCALER, val);
> +
> + return parent_rate / (div + 1);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Linux uses .determine_rate, which barebox does not have. round_rate is
> + * called against the already-selected parent, so we just clamp the divider.
> + * Source selection happens via .set_parent / .get_parent.
> + */
> +static long lan966x_gck_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> + unsigned long div;
> +
> + if (!rate || !*parent_rate)
> + return 0;
> +
> + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, rate);
> + if (div > DIV_MAX + 1)
> + div = DIV_MAX + 1;
> + if (div < 1)
> + div = 1;
> +
> + return *parent_rate / div;
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + return FIELD_GET(GCK_SRC_SEL, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + val &= ~GCK_SRC_SEL;
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(GCK_SRC_SEL, index);
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops lan966x_gck_ops = {
> + .enable = lan966x_gck_enable,
> + .disable = lan966x_gck_disable,
> + .set_rate = lan966x_gck_set_rate,
> + .recalc_rate = lan966x_gck_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = lan966x_gck_round_rate,
> + .set_parent = lan966x_gck_set_parent,
> + .get_parent = lan966x_gck_get_parent,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *lan966x_gck_clk_register(struct device *dev, int i)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + priv->reg = base + (i * 4);
> + priv->hw.init = &init;
> + ret = clk_hw_register(dev, &priv->hw);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(priv);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> +
> + return &priv->hw;
> +};
> +
> +static int lan966x_gate_clk_register(struct device *dev,
> + const struct lan966x_match_data *data,
> + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data,
> + void __iomem *gate_base)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = data->num_generic_clks; i < data->num_total_clks; ++i) {
> + int idx = i - data->num_generic_clks;
> + const struct clk_gate_soc_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = &data->clk_gate_desc[idx];
> +
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate(dev, desc->name,
> + data->name, 0, gate_base,
> + desc->bit_idx,
> + 0, &clk_gate_lock);
> + if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s clock\n",
> + desc->name);
> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
> + }
> + clk_data->clks[i] = clk_hw_to_clk(hw);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_clk_probe(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + const struct lan966x_match_data *data;
> + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data;
> + struct resource *iores;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + data = device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + clk_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*clk_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!clk_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + clk_data->clks = kcalloc(data->num_total_clks,
> + sizeof(*clk_data->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!clk_data->clks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
^
This leaks the clk_data memory.
> + clk_data->clk_num = data->num_total_clks;
> +
> + iores = dev_request_mem_resource(dev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(iores))
> + return PTR_ERR(iores);
Since here you leak both clk_data and clks. Please check the cleanup
path.
> + base = IOMEM(iores->start);
> +
> + init.ops = &lan966x_gck_ops;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < data->num_generic_clks; i++) {
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> +
> + init.name = data->clk_name[i];
> + hw = lan966x_gck_clk_register(dev, i);
> + if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s clock\n",
> + init.name);
> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
This leaks a proper cleanup for previous
allocated clk_hw's.
> + }
> + clk_data->clks[i] = clk_hw_to_clk(hw);
> + }
> +
> + iores = dev_request_mem_resource(dev, 1);
> + if (!IS_ERR(iores)) {
> + void __iomem *gate_base = IOMEM(iores->start);
> +
> + ret = lan966x_gate_clk_register(dev, data, clk_data, gate_base);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return of_clk_add_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_src_onecell_get,
> + clk_data);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id lan966x_clk_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "microchip,lan966x-gck", .data = &lan966x_desc },
> + { .compatible = "microchip,lan9691-gck", .data = &lan969x_desc },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lan966x_clk_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct driver lan966x_clk_driver = {
> + .name = "lan966x-clk",
> + .probe = lan966x_clk_probe,
> + .of_compatible = DRV_OF_COMPAT(lan966x_clk_dt_ids),
> +};
> +postcore_platform_driver(lan966x_clk_driver);
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
>
--
#gernperDu
#CallMeByMyFirstName
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 5:59 [PATCH v1 01/10] ARM: introduce ARCH_MICROCHIP for ARM64 Microchip SoCs Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] serial: atmel: add lan9696 (Microchip LAN969X) support Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 12:49 ` Marco Felsch
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] clk: add Microchip LAN966X / LAN969X generic clock controller driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 12:58 ` Marco Felsch [this message]
2026-06-15 7:02 ` Sascha Hauer
2026-06-15 7:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] clk: tolerate clocks registered without a name Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] pinctrl: ocelot: port Microsemi/Microchip Ocelot pinctrl from Linux Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] mci: atmel-sdhci: add Microchip LAN9691 / LAN969X SDHCI support Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-15 6:17 ` Marco Felsch
2026-06-15 7:25 ` Sascha Hauer
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] gpio: add Microchip SGPIO (serial GPIO) driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-15 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] reset: add Microchip sparx5 / LAN969X / LAN966X switch reset driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] spi: atmel-quadspi: add Microchip LAN966X / LAN969X support Oleksij Rempel
2026-06-12 5:59 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] ARM: add Microchip LAN9696 (LAN969X) SoC and EV23X71A board Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4gne72pfap26srdsgnlcpe7tk723xx64i7idfxjsuqlf2nqmox@hizzlzhfxnno \
--to=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox