mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Shiyan <>
To: Lucas Stach <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: debug_ll: Use Kconfig UART base address
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 11:01:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

чт, 5 мая 2022 г. в 10:55, Lucas Stach <>:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 05.05.2022 um 10:36 +0300 schrieb Alexander Shiyan:
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <>
> Is this really a change in the right direction? The way it is currently
> done seems to mix well with overall multi-image theme of Barebox. By
> using a Kconfig for that, the setting will most likely be wrong for a
> subset of boards in a multi-image build.

Same as PUTC_LL, right?

Actually the debug code is already wrong when we create multiple
images with different UARTs.

barebox mailing list

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05  7:36 Alexander Shiyan
2022-05-05  7:55 ` Lucas Stach
2022-05-05  8:01   ` Alexander Shiyan [this message]
2022-05-05  8:09     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-05-05  8:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-05  9:42   ` Alexander Shiyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: debug_ll: Use Kconfig UART base address' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox