From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <pza@pengutronix.de>,
barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH master] mci: dw_mmc: make reset control optional again
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:16:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110081615.GN25698@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <401d5888-cfd6-4ef7-719b-e4878f7dbb2f@pengutronix.de>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 11:28:11AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On 02.11.21 09:06, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:52:07PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> As documented in 90bdf1e5d1e4 ("mci: dw_mmc: match against StarFive MMC
> >> compatibles"), it was intended for the reset to remain optional as to
> >> not break existing users. Unfortunately, my later a3cf324593ea
> >> ("mci: dw_mmc: add optional reset line") didn't heed that and made it
> >> required, breaking SoCFPGA DW-MMC use as a result.
> >>
> >> Revert that line to fix the regression.
> >>
> >> Fixes: a3cf324593ea ("mci: dw_mmc: add optional reset line")
> >> Reported-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mci/dw_mmc.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mci/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mci/dw_mmc.c
> >> index b402090ab3cb..86c4f43e88f5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mci/dw_mmc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mci/dw_mmc.c
> >> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int dw_mmc_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> >>
> >> rst = reset_control_get(dev, "reset");
> >
> > Philipp, the reset binding lists the reset-names property as optional.
> > What's the expected behaviour of the reset_control_get() above when the
> > reset-names property is not present in the device tree? Should it return
> > an error or should it return the unnamed reset control?
>
> can this revert still be applied for master? I'll look into reworking this
> for next.
Did that.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-10 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 17:52 Ahmad Fatoum
2021-11-02 8:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-11-02 9:04 ` Philipp Zabel
2021-11-08 10:28 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-11-10 8:16 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211110081615.GN25698@pengutronix.de \
--to=sha@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pza@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox